1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naya [18.7K]
3 years ago
11

Why did the U.S. take the land back that had been promised to the Native Americans in the Black Hills region of North and South

Dakota?
A. The U.S. wanted to show its power over Native Americans.
B. The U.S. wanted to keep Native Americans farther away from settlers.
C. Nearby settlers were being raided constantly.
D. Gold was discovered and the U.S. wanted it.
History
2 answers:
cluponka [151]3 years ago
8 0
I think it’s gonna be D
MaRussiya [10]3 years ago
5 0
D. Gold was discovered and the United States wanted it
You might be interested in
The leaders of the US, USSR, and Great Britain said they wanted to cooperate, so why were negotiations at the Yalta and Potsdam
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:  Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.

Context/explanation:

Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests.   So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.

While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them.   As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime."  Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion.  Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR.  That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death.  Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.

Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism.  Again as noted by The Churchill Project:  "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire."  As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
explain whether you believe the Electoral College should be abolished. Make sure to justify your position with at least three re
dsp73
Yes it completely makes it so third party candidates cannot become president. Presidential candidates who did not win a majority of the popular vote were elected president because of the electoral college. Presidential candidates mainly only campaign in swing states.
7 0
3 years ago
What impact did the French Revolution and Napoleon have on Simon Bolivar and Venezuela’s independence movement?
larisa86 [58]

Answer: it provided the platform for the Latin American revolutions.

Explanation: read the documents and positions by the French revolutionaries. The Latin American creoles fought using the same principles.

3 0
3 years ago
What did the european explorers gain from their travel?
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

god, glory, and gold

Explanation:

Europeans went to the new world for these three things mainly. First to spread God's word and convert the natives to Christianity which some found fulfilling. Two glory, people traveled to be the first and to come back as heroes. Third is the gold. Like most things in life people are in it for the wealth and riches. Europeans went to the new world because they were under the impression the would find lots of gold.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following provides the best early evidence of whether the integration of professional sports was a good idea?
s344n2d4d5 [400]

B)the professional success of Jackie Robinson and Willie Mays.  Both were African Americans who played professional baseball and helped promote integration in sports.  Despite their initial hardships both players led their teams to victory and most importantly overcame racisms in professional sports.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The conquest of areas in Egypt and the Middle East increased the flow of which product into Rome? grain olive oil wine marble
    8·1 answer
  • What impact did us troops have on the war ?
    8·1 answer
  • How was Nicaragua involved in the Iran-Contra affair?
    11·1 answer
  • What year was America discovered
    8·2 answers
  • Another name for a city?
    9·1 answer
  • Where are volcanic eruptions and earthquakes least likely to occur: central america, the greater antilles, or the lesser antille
    10·1 answer
  • Which two major Native American empires were conquered by Spain?
    6·1 answer
  • To discourage migrants from moving to Arizona during the Great Depression, the state
    12·2 answers
  • Please help me with this question
    14·1 answer
  • I need to write a 400 word biography about Eli Whitney and his invention of the cotton gin. I don't need anyone to actually writ
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!