Jeffries Corporation's Operating Income from the two products is <em>A. $35,000.</em>
The operating income is the difference between the revenue and operating costs (variable and fixed costs).
Data and Calculations:
Product A Product B Total
Revenue $18.00 $21.00
Variable cost 14.00 13.00
Contribution $4.00 $8.00
Fixed costs $143,000
Total sales units 35,600
Sales mix 3 1 4
Sales units 26,700 8,900 35,600
Total contribution$106,800 $71,200 $178,000
Total fixed costs 143,000
Operating income $35,000
Thus, the operating income is $35,000.
Read more: brainly.com/question/14815746
Answer: False
Explanation:
A sudden stop refers to the sudden decline in net capital inflows in the economy from outside. This is a significant method by which the economy can have access to foreign exchange.
If the country therefore borrows internationally in foreign currencies whilst lending in domestic currency, the sudden stop will be difficult to navigate because it will impair the country's ability to pay off the international creditors it has because it will not have enough of the required foreign currency to pay them.
Answer: finance charge
Explanation: The True in Lending Act (TILA) of 1968 is a Untied States federal law that was created to promote informed customers credit, certain written disclosure be made known before a transaction be consummate.
The fee john is requested to pay by the TILA disclosure statement is the "finance charge ". Standard bank is give John loan and the transaction will be govern by the TILA.
Answer:
dilation of the pupil and loss of accommodation
Explanation:
Mydriasis is the dilation of the pupil of the eye. The dilation causes vision to be blurry.
Cycloplegia on the other hand is the loss of accommodation of the pupil and it is caused by the paralysis of the cilliary muscle of the eye. This paralysis causes the eyes to lose its ability to focus on things nearby.
Looking at this two conditions from the administration of atropine, the expected outcome of the client is blurry vision and inability to focus or see things close by(farsightedness).
I hope this helps.
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
