Answer:
Summemour and Hatcher WERE JOINTLY and SEVERALLY LIABLE
Explanation:
What is Partnership
Partnership is a form of business, where individuals come together to carry on business with the primary intention of making profit. Mostly, they come together by contributing capital and expertise to make the business work . Every partner is however liable and responsible for both the profit made and the losses or liabilities of the partnership.
Although the general partner has unlimited liability, every partner is however jointly and severely liable for the business
Were Summemour and Hatcher Liable?
This case is referred in the J.T. Turner Construction Company v. Summerour and Hatcher(2009). The court this case declared that both Hatcher and Summemour were jointly and severally liable as a result of the following reasons.
A partner becomes liable especially for a prior judgment based on the following
1. The partnership has proven indebtedness
2. A general partner in the partnership was sued to court
Based on these, Summemour and Hatcher WERE JOINTLY and SEVERALLY LIABLE
I Think English is the most common Language for worldwide trade and business
Answer:
1. d. Both a and c.
2. True.
Explanation:
Marsha and Shelby both are U.S. citizen. Marsha can claim Income credit once she is 25 years older up to 65 years of age. The individual below 25 years of age cannot claim income credit according to the tax law prevailing in U.S.
Answer and Explanation:
The Journal entries are shown below:-
1. Salary Expense $1,500
To Salary Payable $1,500
(Being salary expense is recorded)
Here we debited the salary expenses as it increased the expenses and we credited the salary payable as it also increased the liabilities
2. Salary Expense Dr, $2,100
Salary Payable Dr, $1,500
To Cash $3,600
(Being cash paid is recorded)
Here we debited the salary expenses and salary payable as it increased the expenses and decreased the liabilities and we credited cash as it reduced the assets
Answer:
We see that Prog A will give an annual CF of 75%*$6000 = $4500
Prog B will give annual CF of 95%*$6000 = $5700
Disc Rate Kd = 20%
So PV of Annuity of $1 for 5 yrs with Kd = 20% is 2.9906
So NPV of Prog A = CF0+CF1+ ....+Cf5 = -12000+2.9906*4500 = $1,458
So NPV of Prog B= CF0+CF1+ ....+Cf5 = -20000+2.9906*5700 = $(2,954)
So Prog A is more effective as it gives a Positive NPV
