It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question, so I had to look for it. Anyway, here is the answer. Historians disagree about the effectiveness of the New Deal. The one that is not an argument historians present is this: <span>New Deal legislation solved the economic crisis quickly. Hope this helps.</span>
Considering the assertions made by Peter N. Stearns, the reasons he provided in defense of his
assertion that history is useful in the world of work includes "<u>studying history leads to the good upbringing of businesspeople, professionals, and political leaders.</u><u>"</u>
<h3>Some other reasons Peter N. Stearns provided are:</h3>
- Student history helps build people in professions like law and public administration.
- It helps in analysis skills.
- It improves the proficiency to find and analyze sources of information.
- Studying history helps to recognize and assess diverse interpretations, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are various reasons Peter N. Stearns, gave on how history is useful in the world of work.
Learn more about the benefits of History here: brainly.com/question/2875725
Answer: They can declare laws or presidential actions unconstitutional.
During the Taiping Rebellion, the peasants rebelled. It was mostly a civil war which killed scores of people (twenty million people approximately). The movement was a millenarian movement (meaning it occurred because of religious ideology). The movement was led by Hong Xiuquan who claimed he was Jesus' younger brother. Hong Xiuquan wanted to instill social reforms such as collective property, equality for women and replacing Confucian, Buddhist, Daoist and Chinese folk religion with Christianity.
Their rights were to:
Hold office.
Own property.
Vote.
Defend in court.
Pass laws.
Chose officials.
Their responsibilities were:
Jury duty.
Fight when needed.
Soldiers.
Taxes.
Serve in government.
