Answer:
- Correct decision:
E). Mario should not use the source.
- Justification:
H). It has not been peer reviewed.
Explanation:
While conducting research, it is necessary to ensure the credibility of the sources as it may affect the worth or significance of the research. In order to ensure the reliability of the source, peer-reviewed sources are considered scholarly and authentic, as it contains information written or approved by a team of experts.
In the given situation, Mario should be suggested, not to use the source with a justification that it has not been peer-reviewed that implies, it has not been reviewed by the experts. This makes the source less reliable and hence should not be used for the research.
The answer is B, ‘your’ should be our
—Evidence—
•] The sentence “...we learned how to make OUR stories more interesting..” sounds more fluent rather than it being “we learned how to make YOUR stories more interesting..” that sounds not as smooth as the first option.
•] Therefore it’s option B.
Im 85% sure that the answer c
Answer: What he said, by his own words was "The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society, it’s that he spoke as if our society was static, as if no progress had been made, as if this country, a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black, Latino, Asian, rich, poor, young and old, is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. What we know, what we have seen, is that America can change, that is the true genius of this nation." You can shorten this down how ever you want, this is just the smallest part that I thought was fully important.
Explanation:
<span>The answer is description that appeals to the five senses. A sense is a physiological limit of living beings that gives information to discernment. The faculties and their operation, grouping, and hypothesis are covering points contemplated by an assortment of fields.</span>
