Answer:
Fiscal federalism.
Explanation:
In the federal system of governance, <em>fiscal federalism</em> is <em>used to allocate competencies and fiscal instruments to the different layers of administration</em>. For example, by means of <u>grants </u><u>higher levels of governments share countries resources with the lower level of governance</u>. Such allocation can be unconditional and conditional. Conditional allocations vary both in time and geography. Say, a particular state required grant to promote drug education in classrooms in 2017, but the situation improved and it does not need it anymore.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The most likely answer is D because if you company was the only video game producer, your company would be extremly profitable, also due to the sheer number of people that play video games it would be a gold mine (figuratively speaking)
Unauthorized disclosure of Confidential information could be expected to jeopardise national security. Unauthorized disclosure of Secret information could have serious consequences for national security.
Tests for confidentiality determine whether unauthorised disclosure is possible. When performing confidentiality tests, you are attempting to determine whether data is being disclosed to people for whom it was not intended. Confidentiality testing ensures that authentication and encryption mechanisms function in accordance with security requirements. Proper authentication ensures that only authorised users can access the system and view the data.
To know more about Unauthorized disclosure here-
brainly.com/question/17198718
#SPJ4
Answer:
Discrimiation
Explanation:
Although Vanessa has the necessary skills and knowledge to work in any auto repair shop, discrimination can be the reason why she has not been able to find a job in this field. This can be related to social construction bout gender and work, implying there are some jobs considered "suitable" for men or women only.
Answer:
(C) Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Explanation:
In 1965, a case between three teenagers who wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam war and were subsequently suspended for failing to remove the armbands and Des Moines Independent Community School District appeared before the Supreme Court. In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court explained that all form of speech, both symbolic speech such as the protest with armbands are protected under the the first amendment right of freedom of speech and expression. The court concluded that freedom of speech includes as form of symbolic speech.
