Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Return on the stock = (Dividend ÷ Investment) + (capital gain ÷ investment
)
= (Dividend ÷ Investment) + (Final price of the stock - initial price of the stock) ÷ Investment
10 = (1 ÷ 20) × 100 + ((final price - 20) ÷ 20) × 100
10 = 5 + 5 × ( final price - 20)
Final price = 21
Therefore, the stock price should increase by [(21 - 20) ÷ 20] × 100
= 5%
<span>c. no competition.is the answer</span>
Answer:
False
Explanation:
In a competitive market, if production (and consumption) continues until the marginal benefit of one more unit equals marginal cost, then total surplus is maximized.
As for any extra unit produced
Marginal Benefit > Marginal cost = Surplus
Marginal Benefit = Marginal cost = No Surplus / No loss
Marginal Benefit > Marginal cost = loss
When your Marginal benefit is maximum and Marginal cost is minimum then the surplus will be maximized.
Most efficient situation in which benefit is maximum and the cost is minimum results in maximized surplus.
Answer and explanation:
Externalized costs are costs that the society pays that are generated by producers and the consumers of the product. The common example is the use of petrol. If I own a car and I don't like riding bicyle for smaller distances, this means the Carbon dioxie emission caused due to me have to be born by the society. This means that the net effect would be a loss to society caused by the usage of products that are injurious to our ecosystem.
UK has targeted to achieve zero Carbon dioxide emission by 2050, which shows their commitment to social responsibility and we keep dumping things in the oceans because nobody acknowlegdes the damage caused by using plastic made products and also not recycling it. After plastic into the oceans the marine life suffers. The Carbon Dioxide emission is one of the main reasons why the glaciers are melting and many animals are dying annually. We unaware with our responsibilities to our society and love profits no matter if someone dies or get harmed by the operations of the company or using products that have greater externalized costs.
Answer:
b) not likely to have jurisdiction over the case because QuickAds is based in Georgia.
Explanation:
The Alabama court only has jurisdiction in actions that were performed within the boundary of the state of Alabama. Although David is a resident of Alabama, his law suit is likely due to actions carried out in Georgia where QuickAds the internet company is based.
Also QuickAds only contact with persons in Alabama has been through QuickAds passive advertising.
In this scenario the case can be tried in federal court because it can handle cases across state borders.
