A typical counterexample to biocentric egalitarianism is that we tend to believe that killing a cow is worse than killing a carrot.
Biocentric egalitarianism is a theory that suggest that all living things possess equal moral status, that is, nothing is superior to any other.
- The theory of biocentric egalitarianism asserts that plants have the right not to be harmed and same as Animals and Humans.
Hence, a typical counterexample to biocentric egalitarianism is that we tend to believe that killing a cow is worse than killing a carrot.
Read more about Biocentric egalitarianism:
<em>brainly.com/question/25778841</em>
Answer:
In-depth interviews, focus groups, and/or analysis of content sources as the source of its data
Explanation:
<u>Qualitative sociology:</u> The term "qualitative sociology" is determined as one of the different academic journals that deals with sociology. Qualitative sociology tends to publish different research papers based on the "qualitative interpretation" of different social life. Therefore, qualitative sociology mainly includes comparative analysis, photographic studies, ethnography, etc.
Answer:
It is not always necessary to lie.
Explanation:
Lying is not "always" a necessity. Most times, people tell lies to get away from a situation: to deny allegations, to escape punishment or even to escape from shame of the moments. people that lie, if properly investigated, have something they are hiding or they usually have a bad situation (although not always) they want to get away from. This is why people lie. More so, some people also lie to cover their excesses or to gain advantage over a situation. This is the reason why when a person lies, he or she has broken the trust put in him or her by friends, family, colleagues and even bosses. So can we now say that, it is justifiable to break the heart of our loved ones because lie is a necessity? No! When a person is caught lying, trust goes out the window in most cases, and it has to be rebuilt again, all in the name of lie necessary.
From the situations stated above, it can therefore be concluded that, lying is not necessary if people are willing to face the consequence of their actions or if they can stand the shame of their actions also.
According to research by Taylor and her colleagues (1984), <u>perceived control</u> is likely to reduce stress related to a negative life event such as cancer.
Explanation:
Shelley Taylor and her colleagues contributed to the effects of perceived control in the treatment of cancer.
Perceived control is the feeling or a belief by a person which determines his/her own inner state or behavior and influence and modify his/her or one’s own environment in order to bring about the desired outcome.
In the treatment of cancer, perceived control of behavior acts as a control strategy to deal with the immense amount of stress it causes to a person. This provides emotional well being and stability by enhancing the ability and preparing a person to cope up with the stress.
This in turn makes him/her to be mentally strong to bear the stress, feel less pain, and to be supportive with the treatment. This also reduces the impact of stress on physiological parameters like blood pressure, heart rate etc and improves the overall health of the patient.
Perceived control can also be used to cope with stress induced by negative life events like loss of someone dear, joblessness, marital or relational issues, chronic diseases etc
