1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lyrx [107]
3 years ago
6

What does Roosevelt say about the status of diplomatic negotiations with Japan at the time of the Pearl Harbor attack? Do you th

ink diplomatic solutions might have still been possible if the attack had not taken place?
History
1 answer:
Paraphin [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The United States wanted to previously intervene in Japan’s conquest of Dutch East Indies and Singapore. However a surprise attack on December 7, 1941 by Japanese on US naval base located at Pearl Harbour which claimed many lives changed the dynamics.

President Roosevelt of the United States signed the beginning of war against the Japanese. He labeled the diplomatic negotiations for possible peace in Asia.

as deceptive.

Diplomatic solutions would have been possible if the attack didn’t take place before the signing of the agreement.

You might be interested in
Is butter a new world or old world food?
mezya [45]
New world food i think

3 0
3 years ago
In what way was the Islamic expansion into India similar to the way Islam expanded in other areas ?
Elena-2011 [213]
Because they both had to cross a border to get here........you may have to be more specific on the question for me to answer it

7 0
3 years ago
The most reliable measure of public opinion is
Doss [256]

Answer:scientific polls

Explanation:

Public opinion is best measured by public opinion polls, based on scientific polling techniques.

6 0
4 years ago
Woodrow wilson wanted germany divided true or false
jonny [76]
I think the answer is true 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Discuss the position of the Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.
Archy [21]

Answer:

The federalists wanted big government while the anti-federalists wanted a small government

Explanation:

While writing the Consitution, the Federalists wanted to give the Federal Governmet a lot of power so that they can prevent rebellions such as Shay's Rebellion from happening again. Plus, they believed that a strong central government was necessary to protect individual citizens rights and freedom as well as addressing the concerns of their big nation. On the other hand, Anti-Federalists did not want a big government because, they were afarid that the government will abuse its power and hurt states rights. Therefore, they supported a small government with strong state government rights.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Roosevelt received opposition to the new deal from
    5·1 answer
  • what is the most important reason for the end of the (western) roman empire? and what is the least important reason for the end
    15·1 answer
  • A result of the freedom summer campaign was that
    15·2 answers
  • The U.S. Appeals Court has decided that it is not an invasion of a suspect's privacy to be asked for a DNA sample when brought i
    7·1 answer
  • What did the colonies of maryland and pennsylvania have in common?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the Roman Empire last much longer in the east than in the west?​
    5·1 answer
  • What message is the artist trying to get across to viewers regarding
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the British burn Washington, D.C.?
    11·1 answer
  • The Allied forces brought an end to the war in Europe by
    11·1 answer
  • One positive of the industrial Revolution was increased public __ for most children
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!