9514 1404 393
Answer:
- $137.90 more each month
- $246.00 less total interest
Step-by-step explanation:
The amortization formula is ...
A = P(r/12)/(1 -(1 +r/12)^(-12t))
for the monthly payment on principal P at annual rate r for t years. Here, we have P=3300, r = 0.14, and t=1, so the monthly payment is ...
A = $3300(0.14/12)/(1 -(1 +0.14/12)^-12) ≈ $296.30
The payment of $296.30 is ...
$295.30 -158.40 = $137.90 . . . more each month
The total amount paid is 12×$296.30 = $3555.60, so 255.60 in interest. This amount is ...
$501.60 -255.60 = $246.00 . . . less total interest
9514 1404 393
Answer:
- domain: x ∉ {-4, 3}
- range: y ∉ {1}
- horizontal asymptote: y=1
- vertical asymptote: x=3
Step-by-step explanation:
The expression reduces to ...

The domain is limited to values of x where the expression is defined. It is undefined where the denominator is zero, at x=-4 and x=3. The graph of the expression has a "hole" at x=4, where the numerator and denominator factors cancel.
- the domain is all real numbers except -4 and +3
The function approaches the value of 1 as x gets large in magnitude, but it cannot take on the value of 1.
- the range is all real numbers except 1
As discussed in 'range', there is a horizontal asymptote at y=1. That is the value you would get if you were to determine the quotient of the division:*
(x+5)/(x-3) = 1 + (8/(x-3)) . . . . quotient is 1
There is a vertical asymptote at the place where the denominator is zero in the simplified expression: x = 3.
- vertical asymptote at x=3; horizontal asymptote at y=1
_____
* For some rational functions, the numerator has a higher degree than the denominator. In those cases, the quotient may be some function of x. The "end behavior" of the expression will match that function. (Sometimes it is a "slant asymptote", sometimes a higher-degree polynomial.)
Answer:
Matt has 7 cards.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let K, M and Z represent number of cards that Kate, Matt and Zach have.
We have been given that together Kate and Matt have 47 cards. We can represent his information in an equation as:

We are also told that Kate and Zach combine cards they have 126. We can represent his information in an equation as:

Further, Matt and Zach combine they have 93. We can represent his information in an equation as:

Upon subtracting equation (3) from equation (2), we will get:



Upon substituting this value in equation (1), we will get:




Therefore, Matt has 7 cards.
Oakdale is the answer I think