1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Butoxors [25]
3 years ago
12

Was the Treaty of Versailles a good peace treaty for the future or not?

History
2 answers:
Elenna [48]3 years ago
4 0
The Treaty of Versailles Yes, I think that the Treaty of Versailles was very fair to Germany. I think this because Germany deserved something bad in return for even starting the war. It was not fair to Germany how they did not really have a say on what went on in with the Treaty of Versailles. Germany should have known this was going to happen to them. They caused many men to become hurt, and even be killed by their own stupidity. Using the Schliffen Plan might of been good on their part,but in reality that was not a very good move for them. Continuing on and looking at Europe. Europe was destroyed and that should all be put on Germany's shoulders for that because Europe did not deserve anything of what happened to them. I would also have to say that I mostly agree with what Woodrow Wilson had to say. He said that Germany should pay for the things they have done and that is exactly it! I agree with not being able to have an air force in the air which is fair to some point. Flying over others to see where, and what they are doing I think is wrong. That is why I agree with the terms of not being able to have an air force in the air because if you did then you would easily be able to take out the enemy, and who would not do that? Anybody would most likely because it is most likely easier to kill more people with a plane then it is to shoot somebody. I surely did not agree with the fact that some of the land that was already claimed was taken away. From then on with the economy not being that great some countries did not have enough land where as some were on the edge of having nothing.
irina1246 [14]3 years ago
3 0
No, it was one of the main causes of ww2
You might be interested in
Why was the battle of Trenton an important battle for the Americans?
GaryK [48]
Raised morale among colonists
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which dictator do you believe was worse and why?
bekas [8.4K]

Answer: Adolf Hitler

Explanation:

He was cruel to the Jews

4 0
3 years ago
What is magnetic declination
Leni [432]

Answer

The angle on the horizontal plane between magnetic north and true north. Hope this helped!

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The delegates at the convention strongly disagreed about the issue of slavery. Some delegates wanted to ban slavery on moral pri
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

They agreed that Congress could not tax exports and that no law could be passed to ban the slave trade until 1808.

4 0
3 years ago
The nationalist inclinations of the Marshall Court were apparent in a series of decisions on the legal status of ______ within t
KengaRu [80]

The nationalist inclinations of the Marshall Court were apparent in a series of decisions on the legal status of "Indian tribes" within the United States.

<h3>What is the Marshall trilogy?</h3>

Three Supreme Court rulings from the early nineteenth century, together known as the Marshall Trilogy, upheld the political and legal status of Indian tribes. The key features are-

  • According to Johnson v. M'Intosh (1823), private individuals were not permitted to buy land from Native Americans.
  • According to Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831), the Cherokee people were reliant on the United States and had a guardian-like relationship with them.
  • The connection between tribes, state, and federal governments was outlined in Worcester v. Georgia (1832), which declared that the federal government was the only entity with the ability to deal with Indian nations.

The nationalist inclinations of the Marshall Court are shown by-

  • The Marshall Court helped define the reach of the federal judiciary during the early years of the American Republic, a period known as Judicial Nationalism.
  • Marshall's views on nationalism, the broad interpretation of the Constitution, property rights, and the primacy of the federal government over the idea of "states' rights" bolstered the role of the federal government and, in particular, the appellate function of the high court.

Learn more about the Marshall court, here brainly.com/question/5347746

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the clips you just watched, what similar tactics did the presidents use to fulfill the role of chief legislator? Check all th
    12·2 answers
  • One result of the War of 1812 was that the United States a) defeated spain. b) gained control of most of canada c) Maintained in
    9·1 answer
  • The hessians main goal for winning the war was/
    7·1 answer
  • Which answer most correctly compares the outcomes after Worchester v. Georgia and Cherokee Nation v. Georgia?
    6·2 answers
  • Which 2 countries were involved in the assasination of archduke franz ferdinand?
    6·1 answer
  • How many were killed during the dropping of atomic bomb?
    12·1 answer
  • What new class did colonial rule create? How did this eventually lead to the end of colonialism?
    14·1 answer
  • Which best defines radiocarbon dating
    12·1 answer
  • What’s the answer ???
    8·1 answer
  • Help me please hurry
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!