1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Butoxors [25]
3 years ago
12

Was the Treaty of Versailles a good peace treaty for the future or not?

History
2 answers:
Elenna [48]3 years ago
4 0
The Treaty of Versailles Yes, I think that the Treaty of Versailles was very fair to Germany. I think this because Germany deserved something bad in return for even starting the war. It was not fair to Germany how they did not really have a say on what went on in with the Treaty of Versailles. Germany should have known this was going to happen to them. They caused many men to become hurt, and even be killed by their own stupidity. Using the Schliffen Plan might of been good on their part,but in reality that was not a very good move for them. Continuing on and looking at Europe. Europe was destroyed and that should all be put on Germany's shoulders for that because Europe did not deserve anything of what happened to them. I would also have to say that I mostly agree with what Woodrow Wilson had to say. He said that Germany should pay for the things they have done and that is exactly it! I agree with not being able to have an air force in the air which is fair to some point. Flying over others to see where, and what they are doing I think is wrong. That is why I agree with the terms of not being able to have an air force in the air because if you did then you would easily be able to take out the enemy, and who would not do that? Anybody would most likely because it is most likely easier to kill more people with a plane then it is to shoot somebody. I surely did not agree with the fact that some of the land that was already claimed was taken away. From then on with the economy not being that great some countries did not have enough land where as some were on the edge of having nothing.
irina1246 [14]3 years ago
3 0
No, it was one of the main causes of ww2
You might be interested in
Indicate whether the sentence or statement is true or false.
Nat2105 [25]
The answer is True.- I believe 

7 0
3 years ago
In the late 1800s,___
Serga [27]
The answer is India.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
❌100 points❌will mark brainliest❌need someone to do cornell notes for me​
zhuklara [117]

Where is the question at?

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The figure shows a wall of the Grand Canyon. The most ancient rocks of the Grand Canyon formed during which geologic period?
a_sh-v [17]

Answer:

Paleozoic Era

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was appointed as commander-in-chief of the colonial army
Sav [38]
General George Washington was appointed as commander-in-chief of the colonial army, and, as you already know, later became the first president of the United States of America. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Need help with this will award Branliest answer !!!
    6·1 answer
  • In the 1800s, many people in the North moved to ____​
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a method used by state governments to
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a characteristic of economic expansion?
    13·1 answer
  • In a well-written paragraph response, explain how the lives of women changed considerably during World War One.
    7·1 answer
  • ________ are principles used to make decisions about what to produce and how to make it. a)factors of prduction B) economic rule
    12·1 answer
  • How did the railroads help Georgia ?​
    12·1 answer
  • In comparison with england, the population of the north american colonies increased because:
    9·1 answer
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP! PLEASE HELP ME :)
    11·1 answer
  • Helppppp please and thank you
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!