Hi !!
The conclusion to Damian's argument is positive as he is aware of what the problem still is the second one ===>
-
EXPLANATION
<u>He cannot say</u><u> </u>:
1- it's absurd that we have this problem when there is such an easy solution, <em>because he wants things to change</em>
<u>He knows that </u>:
1- Unfortunately, more 100 million plastic grocery bags are still being thrown away every year.
2- Although attempts have been made to recycle these plastic bags, the problem cause by them still exists.
So it's conclusion is that we have to change ►
<u>We need</u> to take active steps and change <u>our habits</u> by using reusable bags instead.
hope this helps ☺☺☺
That would be a fragment. Its not a complete sentence
Making an inference involves using what you know to make a guess about
what you don't know, or reading between the lines.
Hope it helps!
