All categories

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP!!

Mathematics

2 answers:

antiseptic1488 [7]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

V = 150 pi units ^3

Step-by-step explanation:

The volume of a cylinder is given by

V = pi r^2 h

V = pi 10^2 * 15

V = 1500 pi units ^3

german3 years ago

5 0

Explanation: Notice that the figure shown here is a cylinder.

To find the volume of a cylinder, start with the formula

for the volume of a cylinder which is v = πr²h.

Here, notice that our cylinder has a radius of 10 and a height of 15.

So we have (π)(10)²(15).

Start by simplifying the exponent.

(10)² is (10)(10) or (100 units²).

So we have (π)(100 units²)(15).

Now, (100 units²)(15) is 1,500 units³.

So we have 1,500π units³.

So your answer is D.

You might be interested in

Carrie and Ryan have both computed the slope of the least-squares line using data for which the standard deviation of the x-valu

alexdok [17]

Answer:

Carrie's slope value is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

The least square regression line is: $(y -\bar y)=b_{yx} (x-\bar x)$

Here $b_{yx}$ is the slope of the line.

The formula to compute the slope is:

$b_{yx}=r\frac{\sigma_{x}}{\sigma_{y}}$

Here $\sigma_{x}$ = standard deviation of x and $\sigma_{y}$ = standard deviation of y.

It is provided that the standard deviation of x and y are equal.

So the slope of the regression line is:

$b_{yx}=r\frac{\sigma_{x}}{\sigma_{y}}=r\frac{\sigma_{x}}{\sigma_{x}}=r$

Thus, if the standard deviation of x and y are equal the slope of the line is same as the correlation coefficient.

The correlation coefficient is a measure used to determine the strength of the linear relationship between the variables.

It ranges from -1 to 1.

Carrie's slope value was 0.50 and Ryan's slope value was 2.

Since -1 ≤ r ≤ 1 the value of slope cannot be 2.

Thus, Ryan's slope value is incorrect.

6 0

3 years ago

The graphs shown are of the form y = ax2. Which graph has the smallest value for a?

Talja [164]

$y= x^{2}$ is a parabola (looks like the letter U).

The letter a represents the coefficient of $x^{2}$ and it controls two things (1) how wide or narrow the parabola is and (2) whether it is concave up (like a U) or concave down (like an up-side-down).

The absolute value of a (the number without the sign) controls how wide or narrow it is. If the absolute value is a fraction less than 1 the graph gets wider. The smaller the absolute value of the fraction the wider the graph gets.

If the absolute value of a is greater than 1 the graph gets narrower (it gets skinnier). The bigger the absolute value the narrower the graph.

So, if all the graphs look like a U (concave up) then the one with the smallest a is the one that is the widest.

The a also controls whether the graph is concave up or concave down. If a is negative

If a is negative the graph is concave down so any graph that is concave down has a smaller value of a than any graph that is concave up. However, if the graph is concave down the one with the smallest a would be the most narrow one.

So to find the one with the smallest a...
If they are all concave up (like a U) pick the widest one
and
If they are not all concave up pick the narrowest one that is concave down (looks like an upside down U)

3 0

3 years ago

30x4000 I will give brainlest to first person that answers without using calculator

sdas [7]

Answer:

The answer is 1200000.

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

write a word problem in which you multiply a fraction by a number greater than 1. Estimate the product then compare the product

tangare [24]

Answer:

Word problem: A recipe for making cookies use half cup of sugar for 1 cup of flour to make one pound of cookies. How many cups of sugar you need to make 3 pound of cookies.

As you can see to solve that problem you need to multiply the fraction 1/2, which is the number of cups needed to make 1 pound of cookies, times the number of pounds that you want to make.

So, for this problem you have to multiply 1/2 times 3.

My estimate is that the result is 1.5.

You can verify my estimate by multiplying:

1 3x1 3
3 x ----- = ------ = ------ = 1.5
2. 1x2 2

So, I have shown that my estimate was correct.

5 0

2 years ago

you flip a coin 10 times heads comes up 6 times.What is the experimental probability of flipping heads

Gwar [14]

Hey there, you asked what is the experimental probability of flipping heads, heads is 10, so we are going to make a fraction, 10 is the denominator and you add 10 by 6, 10+6=16. So, the fraction is 10/16, 10/16 simplified is 5/8. Therefore, the experimental probability of flipping heads is 5/8

3 0

3 years ago