The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
- Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
- If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.
Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.
In conclusion, option c is correct.
Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.
One major pull factor that contributed to the population growth shown in the urban area of northern Illinois and Indiana was "<span>racial discrimination," since many blacks in the South fled to the North in the hopes of living better lives. </span>
Answer: Japan stayed the same in governing the country, and Germany constricted their goverment To not leave to much power into one person
Explanation:
Did it
Answer: not interested ( I hope tis is right sorry if it wrong)
Explanation:
Each of the twelve chief disciples of Jesus Christ.<span>any important early Christian teacher, especially St. Paul.<span>synonyms:<span>disciple, follower <span>More</span></span></span>the first successful Christian missionary in a country or to a people."Kiril and Metodije, the apostles of the Slavs"</span>
