The essay should show your opinion and understanding of the past presidents' debates. As I do not have access to your interpretations of the debate, I cannot write the essay, but I will show you how to write it.
<h3>Essay structure</h3>
- Introduction: Write a short paragraph, about what this speech was and how inflation was a subject covered in it.
- Thesis statement: Write a single sentence, which should end your introduction. The thesis statement should show which candidate approached the topic of inflation most convincingly in your opinion.
- Body: Write two paragraphs. These paragraphs must be long because they are the ones where you will show your positions on the debate. In the first paragraph, you will show evidence that your thesis statement is correct, showing the reasons that make you believe that a candidate was more convincing and approached the subject correctly. In the second paragraph, you will criticize the way the other candidate approached the subject and show the reasons that make that candidate's arguments not convincing to you.
- Conclusion: You will write a short paragraph, where you will show and reinforce your thesis statement, reaffirming the candidate who was most efficient and how the words of this candidate were in line with the society of that time.
You will need to watch, listen or read the debate to write this essay and you can use articles that analyze the performance of the two candidates to strengthen your arguments.
Below you can see an example of how you can write the introduction and thesis statement for your essay:
<em>The debate between Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan was one of the major milestones of the 1980 presidential election. In that year, American society suffered from a lack of economic stability and rising inflation, which made this one of the most important issues in the debate. , which was best addressed by Reagan.</em>
Learn more about what inflation is:
brainly.com/question/15555995
#SPJ1
An iqv of .35, which describes the level of racial diversity in a southern u.s. state, can be interpreted as 'the southern state of interest sees 35% of the maximum possible differences'.
The index of qualitative variation (IQV) is a measure of the variability of nominal variables such as race, ethnicity, and gender. This type of variable classifies people into categories that cannot be ranked, as opposed to being able to measure income and education that changes from high to low. The index of qualitative variation can vary from 0.00 to 1.00. If we want to look at the changing racial diversity of a place over period of time, we can use the IQV to see how diversity has evolved.
Know more about index of qualitative variation here
brainly.com/question/28043620
#SPJ4
Answer:
Roma, and Lotti Fundia were the conspiritors involved in the murder. Each person played a part in the team. They are all equally guilty for the murder, though. Mama died from a stab wound to the back and chronic lead poisoning.
Repeatedly thinking about your own death is to obsession as repeatedly washing your hands is to compultion.
Obsessions and compulsions are two crucial components of OCD. On this page, we will explain what obsessions are and how they differ from compulsions. The relationship between our thoughts (obsessions) and our behaviors (compulsions) is much more intricate when we have OCD, so we will examine that process later in this section.
Obsessions are unwanted thoughts that are persistent and uncontrollable in nature, though they can also be persistent pictures, impulses, worries, fears, or doubts, or a combination of any or all of these. People with OCD have unwanted obsessions in the form of these. In addition to being persistently bothersome, unpleasant, and obtrusive, they can seriously impair the sufferer's ability to carry out daily activities.
Learn more about obsessions here
brainly.com/question/12174116
#SPJ4
Answer:
sign
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Jimmy is using sign reasoning to explain his position. This type of reasoning asserts that two or more things share a close relationship with one another. So much so that the absence of one would cause the absence of the other and vice versa. Which is what Jimmy is stating by saying that the athletes being bigger and the increased use in steroids are connected.
