Option 3 is correct. The sentence that is incorrect from the list of sentences is Animals made agricultural communities more dangerous.
<h3>What was the impact of the animals to the agricultural communities?</h3>
The animals in the areas were used to help the community and make work easier for humans. The animals were not considered as dangerous because they were a means of helping these communities. They helped to make work faster as well as easier for the people. Animals that make work easier include bull, ox, horse and so on.
Some animals are reared as part of the agricultural business. some are reared for milk, instance of this is certain breed of cow. Some animals are reared for fleece like some breed of sheep. Some are to produce meat. while some animals protects the farmers and their communities against danger, instance of animals trained for protection is dog.
Therefore from the sentences above, the sentence that is false is that Animals made agricultural communities more dangerous.
Read more on agriculture here: brainly.com/question/4755653
#SPJ1
Answer:
Beveridge supports the Open Door policy because of potential economic benefits, while Carnegie opposes it because of possible economic costs
Explanation:
According to the two passages in the debate over the United States’ Open Door policy in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the statement that best contrasts the two points of view between Beveridge and Carnegie is that Beveridge supports the Open Door policy because of potential economic benefits, while Carnegie opposes it because of possible economic costs
The largest social class of ancient China were the peasant farmers.
Answer:
Explanation:
The world was changing because it was preceded by the Industrial Revolution.
These are the factors that led to World war 2 changing:
The Failure of Peace
The Rise of Fascism. .
Formation of the Axis Coalition.
German Aggression in Europe.
The Worldwide Great Depression.
Japan invading of China (1937)
Pearl Harbor and Simultaneous Invasions
