Answer:
2) Debit to Cash (for dividends received from the investee), and a Credit to Dividend Revenue.
Explanation:
Whenever the investment is made in shares of a company where the investor can exercise significant influence, then equity method is used.
Under equity method, it is that all incomes of investee company are incomes of investor company.
And any amount of income received as a distribution is deducted from the carrying value of investment, as reduces the cost of investment.
Thus, any dividend received is debited and investment account is credited.
Dividend is never treated as dividend revenue.
Thus, option 2 is not correct.
Answer:
C)
In order to use the Cost-Benefit Principle correctly we need to compare the marginal benefit of the new spending, which is $25 million, with the marginal cost of the new spending, which is $50 million. This new spending makes no economic sense.
Explanation:
The cost-benefit principle in accounting states that the additional benefit must outweigh additional cost in an accounting system.
Spending of $250 million is giving $400 million revenue. The new proposal of spending $300 million to get $425 million implies we are spending extra $50 million to make extra $25 million.
This is not a good investment according to the cost-benefit principle.
The best answer for this question would be:
<span>b. domestic producers of jet skis are worse off, domestic consumers of jet skis are better off, and the economic well-being of the country rises.
Because originally the jet skis came from the country they originated from so the quality is original and more trusted to the consumers. </span>
<span>If
the friend sues Mary, the court most likely will not require Mary to do
anything because this was a gift promise. In order for a gift promise to be
enforceable by the law, it should be a contract. And in order for it to be a
contract, there should be a consideration received by Mary but in this case, no
consideration was received by Mary therefore, the promise is unenforceable.</span>
