Side stories of other people add to the story , because it shows how they feel about the topic and sooner in the story you'll see how boo radley and tom Robinson are similar to each other
Don’t plagiarize. That’s how you get kicked out of school
C. self-involved:<span>wrapped up in oneself or one's own thoughts. so they wouldn't notice other people talking or anything or the sort</span>
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>The argument that </em><em>Thomas Paine </em><em>counters in this excerpt from his pamphlet </em><em>“Common Sense,” </em><em>highlights that the </em><em>British didn’t and will not provide adequate resources for the growth and development of its colonies. </em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Their give and take ratio is never equal. Paine believed that they would suck out the prosperity of the colonies and not even give anything in return. So he didn’t have any high hopes about the British providing security to its colonies or contributing to their welfare. That is why he wanted the independence for all the people of the Thirteen Colonies. His pamphlet’s main aim was to give rise to the fire of independence in the hearts of these people.
<span>She says how insignificant material possessions are when compared to her feelings of love. She also uses financial imagery to compare her love with that of her husband’s.
It appears in lines 5 and 6, with her mention of “mines of gold” and “the riches that the East doth hold.” She uses these examples of wealth to show that the riches are grand they are worth less to her than the love of her husband.
</span>Lines 3-4: She dares other women to even try to compare their happiness with hers. To my understanding of the poem the answer cannot be B.
Extra: Line 7 can compare to that of the Song of Solomon when on Chapter 8: 7 the beautiful sulemite tells her shepherder: "Waters cannot quench love" (JW.ORG) the same compared in this poem on line 7 explains: "<span>Rivers cannot quench” her love</span>
