1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tomtit [17]
3 years ago
6

List two ways that American Indians and European colonists were allies

History
2 answers:
Alecsey [184]3 years ago
4 0
They traded.
And the Indians shared their land with them.
vaieri [72.5K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The British colonists were supported at various times by the Iroquois, Catawba, and Cherokee tribes, and the French colonists were supported by Wabanaki Confederacy member tribes Abenaki and Mi'kmaq, and the Algonquin, Lenape, Ojibwa, Ottawa, Shawnee, and Wyandot tribes. Their greatest enemies became the tribes of the Blackfoot Confederacy and the Lakota-Cheyenne-Arapaho alliance. The Crow were generally friendly with the northern Plains tribes of the Flathead (although sometimes they had conflicts); Nez Perce, Kutenai, Shoshone, Kiowa and Kiowa Apache.

You might be interested in
20 pts
Maurinko [17]

Answer: it was the shortest naval route between Europe and Asia.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
John Tyler became the President in 1841 and, within one year, his entire cabinet resigned and he was expelled from the Whig part
Sedaia [141]
True. he was expelled from the whig party.
6 0
3 years ago
HELP
torisob [31]

Answer:

At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation:

Plz give me brainliest worked hard

8 0
3 years ago
1. The framers of the Constitution believed the heart and soul of the new Republic was the​
masya89 [10]
The answer may be:
-The fundamental rights of individuals

Article 32 falls under Part III of the Constitution that includes the fundamental rights of individuals. It allows an individual to approach the Supreme Court if she or he believes that her or his fundamental rights have been violated or they need to be enforced.
6 0
2 years ago
Explain why the north had such a large economic stake in avoiding a civil war with the south
kodGreya [7K]

Answer: The north was industrizing there was more oppertunity like fishing farming and many other jobs while in the south there was only farming and farming for slaves.

Explanation: forgive my spelling. plz like

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How is the Electoral College a form of indirect democracy?
    9·1 answer
  • How was the trip from europe to the indian ocean drastically shortened
    8·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the question and answer format of an article?
    7·2 answers
  • How did the 1979 oil shock affect the US economy?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following accurately describes taxes? A. Variable fines charged by the government for wrongdoing
    10·1 answer
  • Which provision of the United States Constitution best supports the idea expressed in this quotation?
    14·1 answer
  • Which figure shows an example of symmetry?
    11·1 answer
  • Why has globalization become such an important part of the world?
    10·1 answer
  • Was Columbus really a conqueror? was he the bad guy? explain your reasoning 5 sentences​
    7·1 answer
  • What 2 factors led to the growth of villages?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!