In a mixed-motive case, the defendant acknowledges that some discriminatory motive existed but argues that the same hiring decision would have been reached even without the discriminatory motive
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
a mixed-motive case?</h3>
Generally, A case of employment discrimination in which there is proof that the respondent employer has valid grounds in addition to discriminatory reasons for adopting a specific negative employment action
In conclusion, In a case with mixed motives, the defendant admits that there was at least some discriminatory intent, but contends that the same employment choice would have been made even if there hadn't been any discriminatory intent.
Read more about the mixed-motive case
brainly.com/question/13122333
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. While the President negotiates foreign treaties, they are ratified by the U.S. senate
Explanation:
i got the answer correct on prepworks.
Answer:
Fertile soil, a long growing season.
Explanation:
There's no specific year in the question so we don't know if it involves slaves or native Americans.
Once they are appointed, they are appointed for life
<span>Among the given choices in this item the statement that is false about the race is that "Race has a biological basis". Thus, the answer is letter C. Race is a group of people that is formed because of similarities in some supposed physical aspects, ancestry, social relations, etc, or those that are in between thanks. </span>
