Answer: C) people define themselves by their group affiliations.
Explanation: Social identity can be simply defined as the perception of an individual on who they are based on the membership they belong to.
Social identity theory is a theory about (in group) who we are and (out group) who they are, the in group will always look for issues to use against the out groups, there by tarnishing the image of the out groups and enhancing theirs.
So option (C); people define themselves by their group affiliations best illustrates social identity theory.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>NO, instead it is a type of authorship dispute.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Authorship dispute arise when a research on a subject is conducted and its result is drawn. But, the name of person who is directly involved in research and conclusion is not mentioned in the <em>published report </em>rather the name of person who took no or little part in the research work is published.
To check the negative consequences of authorship dispute, it is advised to have written legal agreement on <em>authorship between the parties involved.</em>
Convection in the mantle is the answer
It was primarily the gold-minders themselves that took the law into their own hands during the Gold Rush. Laws in these territories were very loosely established and easily avoidable.
Camels can drink water and then not have to drink water for a long long time, thus travellers don’t have to worry about giving them water.
Their feet are good for walking on sand.
Camels have always lived in deserts so they are used to living there, they won’t die as easily.