In the given scenario, Jeremy's experience of the night is most likely to be stored in his<u> "sensory memory".</u>
Sensory memory is the most brief term element of memory. It is the capacity to hold impressions of tangible data after the first improvements have finished. It goes about as a sort of cushion for boosts got through the five faculties of sight, hearing, smell, taste and contact, which are held precisely, yet quickly. For instance, the capacity to take a gander at something and recollect what it looked like with only a second of perception is a case of sensory memory.
Answer:
A) True
Explanation:
1)Post figurative culture : cultural change is gradual, socialization takes place by elder passing knowledge to their kids
2)Configurative culture: cultural change is rapid, adults socialize their children but the peers are more interactive with one another, hence becoming means of socializing for one another
3)Pre figurative culture: cultural change occurring so fast that children might be the ones teaching adults more than they teach them regarding culture knowledge.
I believe the answer here is C change their languages, religion, and customs. since the Spanish we're heavily religious and would do anything to convert more people to they're religion
<span>Resources are scarce because economic goods not have an
infinite supply. As a result, we have to make decisions on how to allocate them
to serve our needs. An example of a scarce resource is gas. Gas powers our cars
and is also used in electricity generation. As our population increases, so
does the demand for gas grows. Gas is scarce has it does not exist in infinite
quantities and requires resources to be converted from oil in the ground to
gas.</span>
Answer:
Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.
Explanation:
For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.
Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.
Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.
