Hi!
Your answer is B.
It is <u><em>not</em></u> A because this doesn't really make sense. It's not the best answer.
It <u><em>is</em></u> B because, in sentences, the words around it will likely give the information you need to infer what the word means.
(For example, if I were to say "<em>She was </em><u><em>continuously</em></u><em> singing, for yesterday she sang for 4 straight hours, and it was extremely annoying</em>", pretend you do not know what "continuously" means. By using the words around it, such as "4 straight hours" you can predict that it means "never stopping".)
It is <u><em>not</em></u> C because not every single sentence contains a synonym or antonym.
(See the sentence above. The antonym of "continuously" would be 'never' or 'sometimes' or possibly 'discontinous'. There isn't always an antonym or synonym there, is there?)
It is <u><em>not</em></u> D because not every single word is defined in a passage.
(When you open an average book, is there just an entire page(s) dedicated to every single definition of a word? Most often, no, there is not.)
Answer:
France saw Indigenous nations as allies, and relied on them for survival and fur trade wealth. Indigenous people traded for European goods, established military alliances and hostilities, intermarried, sometimes converted to Christianity, and participated politically in the governance of New France
Explanation:
It was the general feature of "checks and balances" that was included to address the concern expressed by James Madison, since his main concern was that one part of the government, such as the executive branch, would become too powerful.
The answer to this question is the term chronological. A Chronological orgnizational pattern is a technique of arranging data or information according to the progression of time. Data or information in a chronolical organizational pattern can be arrange either forward or backward.
Answer: ADVERSE SELECTION OF WAGE CUTS
Explanation:
This phenomenon refers to situational where the best employees leave a job because they feel their productivity is higher than they are bring paid for. Conversely, the lesser attractive employees stay because they are being paid equitably or even more than their productivity.
The effect of this can be even more reduced productivity.
For example,
Parrain Inc in response to low productivity drops salaries to $10 an hour for the manufacturing of pencils. Each employee is required to make 30 pencils an hour. Some employees make 40 pencils an hour and feel they are not being well compensated and leave.
This will drop the amount of pencils Parrain Inc is producing. They respond by reducing salaries again which now prompts those that were making 35 pencils an hour to leave. Productivity drops again and the cycle repeats.
