Answer:
if two people are part of a society and one of them has the right to work and earn for himself while the other one is prohibited to do so (i.e. they are unequal before the law), we can safely say that this is an unjust society.
Not the best at law, so i wouldn't completely depend on this^^
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Of organizational life according to which even democratic organizations will become bureaucracies ruled by a few individuals.
Explanation:
The "iron law of oligarchy" notes that all types of organization must gradually and inevitably develop oligarchic tendencies, regardless of how democratic they may be at the outset, rendering true democracy actually and theoretically impossible, particularly in large groups and complex organisations, it is an Organizational theory in which even a democratic entity inevitably evolves into a bureaucracy dominated by a few individuals.
The "iron law of oligarchy " reflects that if a democratic organisation, then a non-democratic organisation, will never be fully democratic.
Answer:
2.freedom of speech
Explanation:
Kevin and Peggy are saying what they think about Police
Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna
Explanation:
In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.
By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
These laws promote vigorous competition and protect consumers from anticompetitive mergers and business practices.
