1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
madam [21]
3 years ago
6

All of the following were results of the Missouri Compromise except that

History
2 answers:
solmaris [256]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Option d

Explanation:

  • Missouri would be admitted to the association as a slave state, however would be adjusted by the confirmation of Maine, a free express, that had since quite a while ago needed to be isolated from Massachusetts.  
  • Servitude was to be avoided from every single new state in the Louisiana Purchase, the southern limit of Missouri due north.The Missouri Compromise was intended to make balance among slave and non-slave states.  
  • At last, the Missouri Compromise neglected to for all time facilitate the hidden strains brought about by the subjugation issue.  
  • The contention that erupted during the bill's drafting forecasted how the country would in the long run separation along regional, monetary and ideological lines 40 years after the fact during the Civil War.
sladkih [1.3K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Option D.

Explanation:

Sectionalism was reduced, is the right answer.

The Missouri Compromise was a law which was enacted to keep a balance of power between South and North in the Senate of the United States. The main motive of this Compromise was to maintain an equilibrium between the number of free and slave states in the Union. During this time, Missouri entered the Union as a slave state and Maine joined as a free state in the union. Since both the free and slave states entered the union, extremists in both the North and South were not satisfied with this compromise. Accordingly, the correct option will be option D, that the Missouri Compromise reduced sectionalism.

You might be interested in
According to Communist Manifesto (1848): how are the predictions of Marx accurate and inaccurate?
gavmur [86]

The Communist Manifesto, first published in 1848 for the Communist League, had little influence in its own day. Only after Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels' other writings had made their views on socialism widely known did it become a standard text. For about a century it was one of the most widely read (and some would argue misread) documents in the world.

But why study it today? Most of the communist world has collapsed. Nominally communist countries like Vietnam and China are busily building market economies in defiance of everything Marx advocated, and Korea and Cuba are barely surviving, serving as models for no one. Has not Marxism been relegated to the ash-heap of history?

There are several reasons why The Communist Manifesto is still an important document. As a historically significant work, it has a certain intrinsic interest. It is good to know what the great ideas are which have shaped history. Some people would argue that Marxists so thoroughly betrayed Marxism that the document can be used to show why attempts at building communist states failed: they were never truly Marxist at all. If true Marxism has never been tried, then it might be worth reconsidering afresh. Or if, as others argue, Marxism has intrinsic flaws that doomed it from the beginning, we might hope to discover traces of them here which might teach us why Marxism should be shunned. The goal here is not to convert you, but to help you explore Marx's writing from his point of view, so that you can understand his actual meaning while still maintaining a stance that can allow you to think critically about the subject and form your own opinions.

It is important to understand that Marx played two important roles in world history: as a critic of capitalism and as an advocate of socialism. He actually wrote very little on the latter subject. Although a strong believer in the importance of building socialism, he spent most of his time and energy on a subtle and complex critique of the capitalist system. This critique is still very influential on many historians, art and literature scholars, sociologists and others. There have been many neo-Marxisms which have been based more or less loosely on the original ideas of Marx and which are widely discussed today. Whether you want to explore such ideas or combat them, it's good to have some notion of the subject.

A manifesto is a document which proclaims publicly--or makes manifest-- the central ideas of a group or individual. Although the organization for which this one was written was underground (for the simple reason that it was illegal) Marx always envisioned the socialist movement as open. He rejected secret conspiracies because his ideal of building socialism was envisioned as a majority enterprise which could only accumulate the necessary momentum through an open, broadly-based campaign of education and exhortation.

Engels was Marx's close collaborator and an important thinker and writer in his own right. He outlived Marx by many years, and produced several volumes which are still influential. Marx was clearly the more powerful thinker of the two, but Engels was the better stylist. Although Engels may have been responsible for much of the eloquent writing in the Manifesto, because it incorporates Marx's ideas and embodies some central concepts of what came to be known as Marxism the following questions will refer to the authors simply as "Marx."






3 0
4 years ago
The german victory at stalingrad was their last great victory of ww ii. please select the best answer from the choices provided
KatRina [158]
The first is false, the second is true
7 0
3 years ago
How did feudalism help Germany?
zlopas [31]
Feudalism spread from France to Spain, Italy and Germany. The feudal system was originally a by-product from the Roman Empire. As the Roman Empire crumbled and the Viking raids increased, large landowners offered land and protection to their tenants in exchange for taxes and labor. By the 11th century, most parts of Germany were dominated by aristocrats. They considered it beneath themselves to farm the land so they offered the land to tenants in exchange for food and labor. They then bore arms and dispensed justice everywhere, even on their own lands. 
6 0
3 years ago
What did the Universal<br> Declaration of Human Rights do?
inn [45]

Answer:

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a historic document which outlined the rights and freedoms everyone is entitled to. It was the first international agreement on the basic principles of human rights.

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
What was the dravidian society
kari74 [83]
The Dravidians were the majority population across the Indian subcontinent before the second millennium
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Document 6
    15·1 answer
  • Are best known for their role in the american victory at the battle of kings mountain and were a loosely organized group of back
    12·1 answer
  • What ended for costa rica in 1948
    10·1 answer
  • What do you think you KNOW about political parties?
    12·2 answers
  • In order to be considered a citizen in Ancient Greece a man had too...
    13·2 answers
  • Based on the map, what conclusion can you draw about ancient civilization
    6·1 answer
  • Why do cells only contain half their genetic material in meiosis?
    5·1 answer
  • With the economic good times and peace of the 1920s, Americans found themselves focusing on
    12·1 answer
  • Explain, in detail, why the Bolsheviks had to use violence in order to start AND maintain a
    12·1 answer
  • Answer ASAP! btw im not going to a site for the answer you scammer.
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!