The goals of the U.N is to keep nations from warring with each other and it basically prevents a nation from taking over the world, and it does its job better than the league of nations did. The U.N is mainly democratic and it deals with foreign policies in the US almost the exact same because both will first try to stop any conflict, and if that does not work start to stop trade, and if that does not work then intervene with military force to stop the conflict. domestic problems and foreign problems are discussed with through a vote in the UN and the US, if the vote wins to intervene in a war the UN intervenes, if the vote that involves not intervening in a war wins the UN does not intervene.
I think the correct answer would be a general sense of mistrust. It would be hard for her to be at peace with people or trust people. She wasn't able to develop this sense of feeling even from her family. Hope this helps. Have a nice day.
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
Answer:
Social Referencing.
Explanation:
Social Referencing is a process in which an infant learns to take cues from the behaviors, emotions, and actions of the adults around them, especially parents or caretakers. In this process, they take cues by looking at the facial expressions of parents or caretakers to know how to respond in a certain situation.
<u>In the given case, Regina's looking at her mother when an unfamiliar man approached her exemplifies social referencing. She was referring to the facial expressions of her mother on how to react at this approach of a strange person</u>.
Thus the correct answer is social referencing.
Answer:
Warfare was more important in Sparta than when it was in Athens. Athens was more concerned with education while Sparta was more concerned with training and fighting.
