The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
Answer:
In an office, every employee has an absolute and comparative advantage depending on the type of work he/she is best at.
In Hector's office, the employee Sasha worked as a computer designer and was excellent in her work. This means that the employee Sasha had an absolute and comparative advantage as she was efficient in her work and hence, there was no opportunity cost of her side of work.
The employee, Maurice was best in logo designing. Hence, he had a absolute and comparative advantage as he was good in logo designing and their was no other opportunity cost for his work.
Answer:
avoidance; escape.
Explanation:
The avoidance behavior can be defined as any actions a person takes to avoid any difficult circumstances and feelings. A person who has avoidance behavior often sidestep their fearful thoughts, dreadful thoughts, and anxiety.
In the given case, Ben is exemplifying the avoidance behavior by not registering for the class on overcoming fear of public speaking.
The escape behavior is a behavior in any person who tries to avoid or delay something unpleasant.
In the given case, Jerry is exemplifying the escape behavior by running away from the stage.
I think the answer is taproot
