Due to the difficulty of denying national security to someone unwilling to pay for it, public goods like national defense are often supported by the government.
Why is it that government funding is typically used to support public goods like the national defense?
National Defense is one of the examples of the public good. If one individual in a particular location is protected against an attack or invasion by a foreign power, other people there are probably similarly protected. Due to the difficulty in charging for defense as a result, it suffers from the well-known free-rider issue. In fact, practically all economists are of the opinion that government action and taxation are the only ways to finance adequate defense.
Learn more about the Public Goods: brainly.com/question/24825090
#SPJ4
Answer:
Compared to adults, when learning a second language, children will do which of the following: more likely to learn from smaller amounts of input, less sensitive to feedback, less likely to use explicit strategies, more likely to learn from large amounts of input.
Answer:Authoritarian Parenting style
Explanation:
Authoritarian Parents are the opposite of permissive parents (who are parents who allows everything and have no rules or regulations on their kids). These parents are like boot camp coaches because the onky thing they expect from their kids is a "yes ma'am and yes sir) .they dictate their kids and they want only their way to be done with no question asked by their kids .
They don't want to know whet their kids think and they are not accepting to kids expressing themselves
They believe kids should listen and do as they are told and they are quick to punish any violations of their rules.
Answer:
No it would not have been successful because Gandhi and everyone else who started to create big movements never used force to convey the bigger message. The king in Britain would send troops to stop the uprising if he saw things were getting out of control. Nonviolence was a good approach because this allowed everyone's voices to be heard and prevent unwanted anger if something were to happen to the people that were trying to protest violently. This also effectively brought change to the world because the king really wanted peace in his territories. He only wanted them to be ruled by him and wanted no unrest. He didn't care what they talked about as long as the people didn't over throw him.
