Why does the equation y=3x+5 Not represent a proportional relationship?
1 answer:
Answer:
see the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
we now that
A relationship between two variables, x, and y, represent a proportional variation if it can be expressed in the form or
In a proportional relationship the constant of proportionality k is equal to the slope m of the line <u><em>and the line passes through the origin</em></u>
In this problem we have
This is the equation of the line in slope intercept form
where
The given equation not represent a proportional relationship, because the line not pass through the origin
In a proportional relationship the value of b (y-intercept) is equal to zero
You might be interested in
Answer:
The second option, or the one attached.
Step-by-step explanation:
This line has a negative slope because the line is going "down the stairs" from the top-left to the bottom-right.
Answer:
= 0.00334
therefore,
3,872.80 > 0.00334
Step-by-step explanation:
Which statement is correct?
(2.06x102x1.88 x 10-1) <7.69x 10
2.3x10-5
(2.06 x 10-2)(1.88 x 10-1) 7.69x 10-
2.3x10-5
7.69 x 10"
(2.06 x 10-2x1.88x10-)>
2.3x10-5
(2.06x 10-2X(1.88x 10-1)-7.69x104
2.3x10-5
Given that;
= 0.00334
therefore,
3,872.80 > 0.00334
