Answer:
the null hypothesis is: The proportion of U.S. adults age 25 or older who smoke is 0.22
Explanation:
A null hypothesis is presumed to be true until evidence proves the contrary. Statistical data nullifies it for an alternative hypothesis.
In this case, the null hypothesis is: The proportion of U.S. adults age 25 or older who smoke is 0.22
The hypothesis that has to prove it is different is: the proportion of U.S. adults age 25 or older who smoke is lower than 0.22
Answer:
The reward to risk ratio for stock Y is 7.22%
The reward to risk ratio for stock Z is 5.50%
Explanation:
First and foremost, it is very important to note that the reward-to-risk ratio of a stock is the risk premium paid by the stock divided by its asset Beta.
The risk premium is calculated as stock expected return minus risk free rate
The risk premium is denoted by (rm – rrf) in Capital Asset Pricing Model of Modgiliani and Miller
For stock Y risk premium is 18.2%-5.2%=13%
For stock Z risk premium is 9.6%-5.2%=4.40%
For stock Y reward to risk ratio=13%/1.8=7.22%
For stock Z reward to risk ratio=4.40%/0.8=5.50%
Hence stock Y has a higher reward to risk ratio
Answer:
If the offer is rejected by the Dall then the offer is no more in place. The particular reason is that Martin is not required to tell Dall that the offer is no more in place. Suppose Martin is wishing to close his offer and till now Dall has not declined the offer. So Martin will have to communicate Dall that the offer is been closed. If Dall has communicated Martin that he has rejected the offer, then this means the offer essence has vanished. Hence Martin has no liability towards Dall, if Dall sues him.
<span>silly mistakes and minor oversights may be a reason your cover letter is thrown out. </span>
Answer:
B. neutralizers
Explanation:
Leadership neutralizers: The term "leadership neutralizers" is described as one of the factors that tend to prevent a specific manager from taking a few actions in order to improve or enhance work performances, or to take the actions that the "manager" ought to do to perform irrelevantly.
In the question above, the given statement is an example of neutralizers impacting leadership styles and behaviors.
