Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Debt = 0.65
Weight = 39.39%
Cost for debt = 2%
Product = 39.39% × 2%
= 0.3939 × 0.02
= 0.007878
Equity = 1.00
Weight = 60.61%
Cost for equity = 6%
Product = 60.61% × 6%
= 0.6061 × 0.06
= 0.036366
Weighted average floatation cost:
= 0.007878 + 0.036366
= 0.044244
= 4.42%
The true cost of the building will then be:
= Funds needed / (1 - Floatation cost)
= $43,000,000 / (1 - 0.044244)
= $43,000,000 / 0.955756
= $44,990,562
Answer:
1.60 percent
Explanation:
exact real rate of return on this investment = interest rate - inflation rate
total revenue gotten by Christina = ( 500 × $ 64.25) + $ 738 = $ 32863
total money invested = 500 × $ 62.30 = $ 31150
her profit = $ 32863 - $ 31150 = $ 1713
interest = $ 1713 / $ 31150 = 0.054992 × 100 = 5.4992 %
exact interest rate = 5.4992 % - 3.9% = 1.5992 approx 1.60 percent
Answer:
For both 10,000 units and 20,000 units, the best alternative is Vendor B
Explanation:
Using the information provided in the question, we can write the following:
Annual Volume of 10,000 units
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 170,000 (we multiply the variable cost per unit by total units)
Fixed costs = 20,000
Total costs = 370,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 140,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 380,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 200,000 (we simply multiply the price by the quantity)
Vendor B
Total cost = 180,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 190,000
The cheapest option is Vendor B
Now for the 20,000 units:
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 340,000
Fixed costs = 200,000
Total costs = 540,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 280,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 520,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 400,000
Vendor B
Total cost = 360,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 380,000
Therefore, Vendor B is once again, the cheapest alternative.
Answer:
C. Ron’s basis in his stock is $27,000
Explanation:
Income recognized on services rendered $21,000
Add basis of $6,000
Ron stock basis $27,000
The property contributed by Ron is not considered insignificant compared to the value of the services he has rendered, which is why the entire contribution is counted as being for property.
Hence, the control requirement is satisfied and a valid § 351 transaction results. Ron’s stock basis is $27,000 [$6,000 (basis of cattle transferred) + $21,000 (income recognized on services rendered)]
Answer:
The refund claimed should be shown as a benefit due to loss carryback in 2018.
Explanation:
Since Tanner, Inc. incurred a financial and taxable loss for 2018. and decided to use the carryback provisions as it had been profitable up to this year, the amounts related to the carryback should be reported in the 2018 financial statements as a benefit due.
Tax loss carryback is when a corporation <u>retrospectively adjusts its tax returns for prior periods</u> if it incurs a net operating loss (NOL) in current period.
The loss carryback <u>generates a tax refund</u> for the business because it reduces previous year tax liability. After the carried back loss is applied, it will be <u>as though the business overpaid taxes the previous year; which will now be shown as a benefit in the current year</u>
