Answer:
price, buyer income, the price of related goods, consumer tastes, and any consumer expectations of future supply and price.
Please Mark Brainliest If This Helped!
According to the Act, a summary conviction carries a maximum fine of $25,000 and/or a potential sentence of six months in jail if the person commits copyright infringement for the first time.
<h3>
How hard is it to sue for copyright infringement?</h3>
It's a challenging process, especially for independent contractors and small business owners. Even while the copyright violation may be emotionally upsetting, you should also take your financial losses into account.
According to the Copyright Act, criminal proceedings may be brought if the infringement is very severe. According to the Act, a summary conviction has a maximum fine of $25,000 and/or a maximum sentence of six months in jail, whereas an indictment-based conviction carries a maximum fine of $1 million and/or a maximum sentence of five years in jail.
Learn more about Copyright Infringement here:
brainly.com/question/16774161
#SPJ4
Answer:
The signs reference the role of the government in protecting the natural rights of the people.
Explanation:
Taking into consideration the signs that the protesters carry, their demands seem to be regarding the safety and security of the rights of not only the people but also that of the whole planet, including the planets and animals. The reference to "Life, Liberty, and Property" in their protest also suggest their intention of demanding for the protection of the whole planet including Mother Earth.
And so, with these signs, the protesters utilizes the Declaration of Independence in emphasizing their demands of the natural rights of the people. The demand that the people have the right to have a livable planet and be safe is an undeniable right. that With the Declaration a part of their reference, they are alluding to the role of the government in ensuring the protection of the people's natural rights.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
Answer: The correct answer is DISSENTING OPINION.
Explanation: DISSENTING OPINION refers to an opinion in a legal case expressing disagreement with the majority opinion.
Dissenting Opinion (or dissent) is written by a judge or judges when a majority opinion has been reached but there is disagreement with the final decision.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Ambiguity in contracts can be voided if subjected to more than one interpretation and may be dismissed as evidence if the court has determined the Contract falls under ambiguity.