The audit expectation gap is caused by unrealistic user expectations. The auditors provides reasonable gap examples that would not be included in unrealistic user expectations.
NASBA believes the expectancy gap relating to fraud and going problems in a financial statement audit may be caused by a few factors: lack of knowledge by way of the general public as to what an audit is and what auditors do; inconsistent audit execution in these regions by some auditors due to lack of expertise.
The expectation hole exists while auditors and the public keep distinct beliefs about the auditors' obligations and obligations and the messages conveyed by way of audit reports. apparently, there's an opening between what the public expects and what it virtually receives.
Learn more about auditors here: brainly.com/question/26048609
#SPJ4
Answer: quid pro quo sexual harassment
Explanation:
The scenario represented in the question regarding Rhonda and her company's chief financial officer is referred to as quid pro quo sexual harassment.
Quid pro quo sexual harassment is a situation that occurs when benefits, pay, employment, position, training, title, position are based on the condition that the other individual involved agree to ones sexual advances. It should be noted that this is illegal.
Answer:
The correct answer is (e)
Explanation:
Strategy implementation is an integral part of business activities. It is the responsibility of managers to keep an eye on all the process and make sure that all strategies are properly implemented. So, selling middle and supervisory manager on changes to overcome their resistance is often a necessary part of strategy implementation. It’s their duty to handle the resistance from employees and other staff members.
Answer:
Factual arguments attempt to establish whether something is or is not so. Facts become arguments when they're controversial in themselves or when they're used to challenge or change people's beliefs.
Explanation:
The money is skimmed before the transaction is processed. In a casino the casinos winning are moves to a count room during the movement money is removed before being counted.
