Long story short, he was a bad guy
Long story long, he was brought into office in 1917 after the tsar of Russia was overthrown, people were looking for somebody to lead and they settled on Lenin. He brought the idea of communism which is known for plaguing Europe and Asia and caused many wars about 40 years later notably Korea, Vietnam, and the Cold War.
Lenin had about 28,000 executions a year which would bring about the communist government becoming a tyranny.
His ideology for the USSR would stay in place for when Stalin became the leader and Stalin would adopt many of those cruel policies Lenin had and continued to worsen them.
Source: https://yesterday.uktv.co.uk/russian-revolution-in-colour/article/lenin-heroic-visionary-or-tyrant/
Pro Slavery- Their thoughts- we white folks are richer and better than these poor "blacks" we should be in control of them, they can help us take care of crops and be our slaves, it will make life easier.
Anti Slavery- it's unconstitutional, and wrong for people to treat people this way.
I am 100% against slavery i just wanted to put both sides of an argument.
god bless and have a good day <3
The Code of Hammurabi, written in cuneiform. This promoted literacy in society. King Hammurabi ruled Babylonia from 1792-1750 BCE. Claiming that he received laws from the sun god, Shamash, Hammurabi declared a set of 282 laws known as Hammurabi's Code. These laws deal with all aspects of everyday life, and it describes both major and minor offenses and their punishments. However, the rich and poor, men and women, and elites and commoners were treated differently under the law. This deepened the social hierarchy and distinctions between classes and genders, which soon became normal and accepted in society. These laws also influenced the need for one, powerful leader. It used the political power to generate bonds between the people of different races and backgrounds. The code also unified, consolidated, and secured the empire by setting a standard for moral values, religion, class structure, and gender relationships.
It’s Gibsons v Ogden: Defending Congress’ power under the commerce clause