Answer:
A. Raphael spend $800
B.$800
C.VALUE ADDED
Explanation:
A. The amount of $800 is the amount that would be included in the expenditure method reason been that Rapheal used the amount of $800 to pay for a new high-definition television (HDTV) as well as its installation
B. The total contribution to GDP which is measured by the expenditure method, is the amount of $800 calculated as :
The Stages of Production; The Sale Value - The Cost of Intermediate Goods = VALUE ADDED
The Home Station $50 - $0 = $50
Firedog $650 -$50 =$600
Better Buy $800- $650=$150
TOTAL $800
($50+$600+$150)
C.The contribution to GDP that you found using the expenditure approach corresponds to the sum of the VALUE ADDED at each stage of production
Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Total expenses:
= mortgage interest + property tax + utilities and maintenance + Depreciation expense
= $5,000 + $600 + $900 + $3,500
= $10,000
Proportionate rental expenses = Total expenses × 
Proportionate rental expenses = 10,000 × 
= $7,200
Rental Loss = Rental Income - Proportionate rental expenses
= $4,000 - $7,200
= -($3,200)
Your answer is <span>telecommuting or B.</span>
Answer:
That the car wash was not liable to the plaintiff because the car wash employees had no notice they were taking responsibility for so much jewelry.
Explanation:
The case of Ziva Jewelry Inc., v. Car Wash Headquarters Inc involved a salesperson Stewart who locked jewellery in his car and took it to the car wash.
He did not disclose that there was expensive jewelry in the car.
The attendant finished washing the car and signalled to Stewart that his car was ready and walked away from the car.
Before Stewart could pay the bill someone had taken the car. Although the police recovered the car the jewellery was stolen.
Zeva Jewellry filed a motion against the car wash that they did not excercise due care in returning the vehicle.
In this instance the car wash was not liable because Stewart did not disclose there was expensive jewelry in the car.
Also the attendant had finished with his car and informed him of this. So it was out of their care when the car theft occured