Answer:
imports exceed exports by $50 billion.
Explanation:
Calculation to determine how much imports exceed exports
Gross Domestic Product $1.2 trillion
Less Consumption ($690 billion)
Less Investment ($200 billion)
Less Government spending ($260 billion)
($1.2 trillion-$690 billion-$200 billion-$260 billion)
Then:imports exceed exports by $50 billion
The correct answer to go in the blank would be ''Deadlock''.
The assessment ratio, which is used to convert the value of property to the assessed value, can also be considered <u>Equalization Rate</u>.
<h3>What is the equalization rate?</h3>
The equalization rate is the ratio of the total assessed value (AV) to a municipality's total market value (MV).
The equalization rate is a measurement of a municipality's level of assessment (LOA) by the state.
This implies that the municipality determines the AV while the state determines the MV.
Thus, the assessment ratio, which is used to convert the value of property to the assessed value, can also be considered <u>Equalization Rate</u>.
Learn more about the equalization rate at brainly.com/question/5428406
#SPJ1
Answer:
The president of Riggs has missed something.
She should make the Sail instead of buying because its cheaper to manufacture than purchasing it outside.
Explanation:
<u>Cost of Manufacturing the Sails:</u>
Direct materials $93
Direct Labor $83
Total $173
The president of Riggs has included the $90 overhead based on $78,000 of annual fixed overhead that is allocated using normal capacity in the cost of manufacturing the sail which is incorrect.
Riggs Company is operating at 80 % of full capacity, hence utelizing the 20% excess capacity would not expand its fixed costs.
Thus said the current fixed cost are irrelevent for this decison and would be incurred whether or not Riggs Company utilizes the excess capacity
<u>Conclusion:</u>
The cost of making the sail is $173 which is lower than the cost of buying them at $ 258.
I would advise The president of Riggs to make the sail by utilizing the excess capacity since its cheaper than purchasing it outside.
Answer:
Conyers = $38,580
Poodle = $222,420
Explanation:
Annual salary allowance to Poodle of $146,160.
Interest of 6% on each partner's capital balance on January 1.
Any remaining net income divided to Conyers and Poodle, 1:2.
net income $261,000
distribution of interests:
- Conyers = $54,000 x 6% = $3,240
- Poodle = $93,000 x 6% = $5,580
drawings (annual salary allowance):
remaining income = $261,000 - $146,160 - $3,240 - $5,580 = $106,020
- Conyers (1/3) = $35,340
- Poodle (2/3) = $70,680
total distributed:
- Conyers = $3,240 + $35,340 = $38,580
- Poodle = $5.580 + $146,160 + $70,680 = $222,420
