Answer:
Yes (It's more inefficient)
Explanation:
in ecology there are things called primary producers (plants) that are eaten by primary consumers (cows and chickens) and then there are humans, secondary consumers, that eat cows and chickens for energy.
The further we move from eating primary producers the more inefficient we become in consuming energy. Meaning, it requires a lot more natural energy consumption to support a human that lives on meat only as compared to a human that eats plants only. this inefficiency only magnifies when communities practice unsustainable food methods.
There are sustainable ways to eat meat, but (at least in the US) our current conventions of meat production are unsustainable and environmentally destructive.
The correct answer is angioplasty.
<span>
Angioplasty is one of the treatments after heart attack including special tubing with an attached deflated balloon. The tube is threaded up to the coronary arteries. Angioplasty is usually combined with the placement of a small tube called a stent which helps to restore the flow of blood through the artery and decreases its chance of narrowing again.</span>
<span>The organic substance making up the cells of all living things is protoplasm.
Whereas cytoplasm, tissue, and organelles definitely do exist in living things, they do not make up the cells of all living things.
</span>
