Answer:
Explanation:
- mutually exclusive (ME): If one event occur the other doesn't
- collectively exhaustive (CE): one of the events must occur
a. Undergraduate business students were asked whether they were sophomores or juniors: ME
b. Each respondent was classified by the type of car he or she drives: sedan, SUV, American, European, Asian, or none. ME - CE
c. people were asked, "Do you currently live in (i) an apartment or (ii) a house?": ME
d. A product was classified as defective or not defective: ME - CE
Answer:
$8
Explanation:
The yearly amount of interest earned on a $100 deposit at 4 percent rate is:
Since simple interest investments yield a constant interest each year, the amount earned after two years is:
The total amount earned is $8.
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Answer:
I will take $36,230.5 to pay for the education of child.
Explanation:
Cash Invested in the saving account will earn a return of 8% each year and this amount could be withdrawn by the me to pay for the education of child.
We will use following formula to calculate the annual payments
P = r ( PV ) / [ 1 - ( 1+ r )^-n ]
where
PV = amount of investment = $120,000
r = rate of return = 8%
n = number of period = 4 years
P = 8% ( 120,000 ) / [ 1 - ( 1 + 0.08 )^-4 ]
P = 36,230.5
