All University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine graduates who received disciplinary action from the California Medical Board between 1990 and 2000 were the subject of a case-control study.
By medical school graduating year and preferred specialty, control graduates were matched.
The National Board of Medical Examiner scores, the male gender, undergraduate grade point average, MCAT scores, medical school grades, and negative excerpts describing unprofessional behavior from course evaluation forms, dean's letters of recommendation for residencies, and administrative correspondence were the predictor variables.
The severity of unfavorable extracts was graded (Good/Trace versus Concern/Problem/Extreme). The outcome factor was disciplinary action taken by the state board.
To learn more about Disciplinary Action here
brainly.com/question/27833954
#SPJ4
Answer:
South America's predominant democratic regimes and its increasing interdependence on regional trade have not precluded the emergence of militarized crises between Colombia and Venezuela or the revival of boundary claims between Chile and Peru. This way, how can we characterize a zone that, in spite of its flourishing democracy and dense economic ties, remain involved in territorial disputes for whose resolution the use of force has not yet been discarded? This article contends that existing classifications of zones of peace are not adequate to explain this unusual coexistence. Thus, its main purpose is to develop a new analytical category of regional peace for assessing this phenomenon: the hybrid peace. It aims to research the evolution of security systems in South America during the previous century and build a new, threefold classification of peace zones: negative peace zones, hybrid peace zones, and positive peace zones.
Explanation:
mark me brainliest
Answer: Has it not started yet?
Explanation:
If it hasn't something is wrong. Or it's too early!
The <span>neglect of contradictory information in the O.J. Simpson murder trial is evidence of the framing effect in decision-making. The framing effect refers to the cognitive bias or irrational logic of favoring choices based on how they were presented. Thus, the presentation of arguments in a different light can affect how people decide. </span>
