How would we tell a hero story today? What would be the setting, what would the enemy be, and what values would the hero embody?

1 answer:

7 0

The earth as we know it, is always evolving, so every minimal act that we perform for it, can make a change. To create a story about a hero, I would use a park as the setting. I would catalog as a villain, anyone who throws garbage, as it directly affects our ecosystem and contributes to the destruction of the planet. A hero in this case, would be that person who is inclined to pick up garbage, or who performs the proper recycling of these. Directly, it contributes a grain of sand to protect our planet, and indirectly saving the lives of us all. The main value found here is education, so important to substise and lead a harmonious life.

You might be interested in

What is the difference between skimming and previewing?

Eddi Din [679]

Ok so I believe that skimming is just quickly reading through the passage to look for keywords through the text to get the general overview....but previewing is getting an idea of what the text is abt withought reading the main body of it. Hope this helps!

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please please help me please

finlep [7]

Answer:

I think it is first so a

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following rhyming schemes has the writer used to create poetic structure?

german

Answer:

the third one

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Question 2

ira [324]

When considering shifts, a writer should consider point of view, verb tense, mood and voice, and "Shifts from indirect to direct questions or quotations." (Option A).

<h3>What is a shift in literature?</h3><h3></h3>

A shift refers to the alteration of writing style to provide variety to the reader.

Hence, it is right to state that when considering shifts, a writer should consider point of view, verb tense, mood and voice, and "Shifts from indirect to direct questions or quotations."

Learn more about shifts at;
brainly.com/question/11425576
#SPJ1

7 0

2 years ago

When phil davison said "use it not only as a tool, but as a weapon," he violated which guideline of proactive speech delivery?.

zalisa [80]

When Phil Davison said "use it not only as a tool, but as a weapon," he violated which guideline of proactive speech delivery as he did everything opposite to the guidelines of a proactive speech rules.

Because these are the rules apply to proactive speech, the speech should be meaningful and your voice should be expressive. Reduce the number of pauses while delivering the speech like ums, uhs, likes, and y'knows. Spell words out loudly. Don't murmur or mispronounce them.

Use the proper volume and pace when speaking. Consider the topic, location, and audience. To make your point clearer and keep the audience's attention, vary your voice's pace, intonation, and power. But what Phil Davison did was Despite possessing a master's in communication, things just get worse from there.

His voice starts to grow, but not in the positive way we talked about in class. Davison starts shouting at the top of his lungs one minute and twenty-five seconds into the speech. If frightening the audience by screaming at them qualifies as pathos, Davison is making the most of pathos. I was unable to discover how Davison used pathos in any other way. And he did everything against the guidelines of proactive speech.

To know more about speech:

brainly.com/question/3743745

#SPJ4

7 0

2 years ago