That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
In classical conditioning, the neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus after conditioning.
<h3><u>
What is classical conditioning?</u></h3>
- Classical conditioning is a behavioral technique in which a biologically powerful stimulus (such food) is combined with a previously neutral stimulus.
- It is sometimes referred to as Pavlovian conditioning or responder conditioning (e.g. a bell).
- It also describes the process of learning that follows this pairing, in which the neutral stimulus eventually learns to elicit a response (such as salivation) that is typically similar to the one induced by the powerful stimulus.
- Operant conditioning, often known as instrumental conditioning, is a type of conditioning in which the strength of a voluntary behavior is altered by rewarding or punishing it.
Opportunistic responses may be reinforced by classically conditioned stimuli. However, classical conditioning can have a variety of effects on operant conditioning.
Know more about classical conditioning with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/12691454
#SPJ4
Ancient China's first civilizations formed near the Huang He, also known as the Yellow River. Just like other river valley civilizations, the Huang He would flood and leave behind large amounts of yellowish fertile soil called loess. The flooding of the Yellow River was both a good and bad thing for the Chinese.
It has a big impact on how a message is received it is false
