1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MakcuM [25]
2 years ago
13

during the mental status examination, a client may be asked to explain such proverbs as "don't cry over spilled milk." the purpo

se of this is to evaluate the client's ability to think:
Social Studies
1 answer:
sdas [7]2 years ago
7 0

During the mental status examination, a client may be asked to explain such proverbs as "Don't cry over spilled milk." The purpose of this is to evaluate the client's ability to think: abstractly.

The correct option is a.

Abstract thinking is the capacity to comprehend and decipher meaning. It's a higher level of intellectual functioning than concrete thinking, in which the client explains the proverb by its literal meaning. Rational thinking involves the capacity to think clearly, make decisions, and be goal-directed.

Tangential thinking is scattered, non-goal-directed, and hard to follow. Clients with such conditions as organic brain disease and schizophrenia typically can't conceptualise and comprehend abstract meaning. Their literal interpretation of phrases like "Don't cry over spilled milk" is "Even if you spill your milk, you shouldn't cry about it."

During the mental status examination, a client may be asked to explain such proverbs as "Don't cry over spilled milk." The purpose of this is to evaluate the client's ability to think:

a. abstractly.

b. tangentially.

c. concretely.

d. rationally.

To learn more about Abstract thinking, refer

brainly.com/question/7159597

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
A reaction in which a system gives off heat to its surroundings is known as?.
Levart [38]
A chemical reaction or physical change is exothermic
6 0
2 years ago
What did C. Wright Mills mean when he used the phrase ""the sociological imagination?"" Think of some event in the world or in y
sattari [20]

Sociological imagination, above all, requires us to think outside the familiar routines of our daily lives in order to observe them in a renewed way, free from the judgments of value and the influence of common sense. Giddens in his book Sociology uses the example of coffee, but here we can use a series of other examples to demonstrate how "sociological imagination" works. Using coffee as an example, Giddens points out that coffee has symbolic value as part of our daily social activities; we can then use beer as an example, although not very happy, usually at the end of the working day or on weekends, men and women get together to “have a beer to relax” using the drink as a subterfuge, but in this apparently simple act , harmless, commonplace, there are a number of issues, such as alcoholism, dry law, “not knowing how to stop”, the production of this drink, consumption by minors, usually started at home, its history, advertising etc.

Another example is tea, which we could say, from a sociological perspective on the consumption of this drink, of this ritual usually associated with the British, punctuality and women's meetings (baby shower, bridal shower)

3 0
3 years ago
How do members of congress propose a bill?
mr_godi [17]

An idea for a bill may come from anybody, however only Members of Congress can introduce a bill in Congress. Bills can be introduced at any time the House is in session. There are four basic types of legislation: bills; joint resolutions; concurrent resolutions; and simple resolutions. A bill's type must be determined.

3 0
3 years ago
Why is it important to protect the stratosphere
mixer [17]

Answer: The stratosphere is where you'll find the very important ozone layer. The ozone layer helps protect us from ultraviolet radiation (UV) from the sun. In fact, the ozone layer absorbs most of the UV radiation the sun sends to us

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do juries decide court cases fairly when one of the opposing parties is rich and the other is poor?No; because rich people can a
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

No; because rich people can afford to hire better lawyers than poor people, and juries are influenced by the skill of the opposing lawyers.

Explanation:

The Juries tend to be unfair in their judgement when a case is between two parties in which one is rich and the other is poor.

This happens because the poor person may not have money to hire a good lawyer who will may influence the jury during the process while the rich person hires top notch lawyer, and the skill of such lawyer can influence judgement.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • As suggested by the "________ hypothesis," the cessation of the menstrual cycle while a female is at full physical capacity allo
    11·1 answer
  • Who were the Tuskegee airmen and how important were they to the war effort? What successes did they have?
    6·2 answers
  • What is the difference between prejudice and bias?
    10·2 answers
  • Professor X assigns a paper in which students are to demonstrate "conceptual understanding by applying concepts to the real worl
    7·1 answer
  • what were the intellectual contributions and roles that islam has played in history and our modern times today
    9·1 answer
  • What is the decay of peoples values
    13·1 answer
  • What is a communism government​
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of the use of personal distance in the united states?
    11·1 answer
  • Net working capital: Group of answer choices requirements, A.such as an increase in accounts receivable, create a cash inflow at
    13·1 answer
  • Which form of goverment would have the least amount of citizen participation
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!