The construction of the British canal system was key in the industrialization of these territories. However, in comparison to the canals up north of the UK, there were some canals that were not connected to the system in the south. The purpose of them was to serve the local industries in England and Wales. However, these were largely unutilized due to the preference from people towards other methods of transportation.
What were rationing programs implemented to do? What types of things were rationed?
En Pangea los dos continentes que tienen el ajuste de costa más obvio son América del Sur y África
<h3>¿Qué era la Pangea?</h3>
Pangea es un término científico para referirse al supercontinente que existió en la Tierra entre las eras paleozoica y Mesozoica. Este supercontinente se caracterizó por agrupar la mayoría de la superficie emergida de esa época.
La Pangea fue el resultado del movimiento constante de la litósfera terrestre y las placas tectónicas. Más adelante (cerca de hace 175 millones de años) este supercontinente se factura y comienza a dividirse estableciendo la forma actual de los continentes.
Una de las formas para llegar al estudio de la Pangea es la similitud de las formas de las costas de los continentes, en el caso de América de sur, su costa oriental tiene una forma cóncava y la costa occidental de África que tiene una forma convexa permiten inferir que en algún momento estuvieron pegadas porque encajan perfectamente.
Aprenda más sobre Pangea en: brainly.com/question/1867605
Answer:
Throughout the clarification segment elsewhere here, the definition including its concern is mentioned.
Explanation:
- Through me, the demand for amounts of unhealthy food seems to be inelastic in terms of costs. I acknowledge that as the cost goes up, consumers will consume less junk food, but perhaps the decrease in the supply is lower than that of the rising rise. It might be because, already though, substitutes for junk foods, particularly across the Us, are challenging to find. Unhealthy food is just the shortest and simplest meal to consume.
- The reasoning here seems to be that every customer would have to purchase food even though the price rises by 1%, so consumption will still decrease by somewhere around 1%. So perhaps we can assume that quality does not influence quantities throughout the Junk Food industry.
- The reduction of excess baggage would be small since it is inelastic. This symbolizes the corporation's low incompetence and as the cost is changed, the market for quantities is approximately the same, not so much impact.
- I thought taxing junk foods, especially to maximize welfare spending, is a smart option. But obesity over here Is not going to help. The incorrect method for combating obesity as well as making our diets balanced is taxes. The irony is that all clients are impacted by taxes regardless of their weight status. The impact of food taxes is unclear and may result in the replacement of items that may comprise of calories that seem to be equivalent or higher.
