1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ivanzaharov [21]
3 years ago
12

17. What was one of the most horrific chapters of World War II?!

History
2 answers:
frez [133]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

b) the Holocaust

Explanation:

The true answer here depends on every persons own opinion. Maybe to a French man, the invasion of his homeland would be the most terrifying thing - maybe to an US citizen the attack on Pearl Harbor would be terrible. But the most horrific act of WW2, globally recognized is the German army killing more than 6 million jews just because they believed in the ideology of being "the master race".

Romashka-Z-Leto [24]3 years ago
4 0
B(the holocaust )
Killed many innocent Jews
You might be interested in
Select four elements of civilization. technology division of labor an agrarian society political organization commerce and trade
UNO [17]
Technology
division of labor
political organization
<span>commerce and trade</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Direct democracy is a system in which participate in government decisions directly
spayn [35]
If this is a true or false question i believe it is True
5 0
3 years ago
Which is a legacy of the French philosopher Montesquieu?
marta [7]
The primary legacy of the French philosopher Montesquieu is "<span>b. three branches of federal government in the United States" since he was one of the major thinkers of the Enlightenment who had a great deal of influence on the Founding Fathers. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
3. "Source 1: A Doctor's Report" and "Source 2: No Compensation" discuss the injuries and the outcomes of injuries on the worker
natka813 [3]

Answer:

There could be a big effect, source one is the better because it explains the patients symptoms and problem and how it happened. People may not want to work at that place any more, or they would start a riot

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can you help me with imperialism i learning about it?
    8·1 answer
  • What factors drew Collier to military service? According to Collier, what behavior did she and other lesbian service members pro
    13·1 answer
  • In poetry meter is the pattern of ​
    14·2 answers
  • Remembering the battle of bunker hill, what did general Howe and his troops do?
    13·2 answers
  • HELP ME NOW!!! BRAINLIEST!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Stockholders were a factor in contributing to efficient production.<br><br> True<br> False
    6·1 answer
  • When the 15th Amendment was passed following the Civil War, which of these groups benefitted MOST?
    10·1 answer
  • HELP 10 POINTS!!!<br><br> Saul was a: <br><br> scribe <br> Pharisee <br> Sadducee <br> Essene
    10·1 answer
  • What caused the texas revolution
    10·1 answer
  • Do the names we use for historical events influence the way we think about those events?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!