Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The major procedures that investigators must use to collect network trace evidence of computer-related crimes include the following:
1. Establish appropriate guidelines to follow: before starting the actual investigation, all the legal procedures and instructions to follow must be clearly stated and shown to everybody involved in the investigation process.
2. Assess the Evidence: the investigators must assess all the available evidence by checking the computer through a specific means. The assessment includes checking of hard drives, email accounts, social networking sites, or similar digital prints that can be used as proof of the criminal activities
3. Acquire the Evidence: here the investigators must find an appropriate means of gathering the evidence formally and legally. This may involve the removal of any form of hardware such as hard drives, and software-related items that can be extracted.
4. Examine the Evidence: this involved examination of the acquired evidence, to determine if it can be used as proof or not. This involved analyzing the evidence to check if they correlate with the criminal activities under investigation. Some of the things to check include, date of formation of the evidence, the names attached to it, the routes those data were sent or received from, etc.
5. Prepare a report and document them appropriately: this involved the proper detailing and recording of the information derived from the evidence. It includes the time of evidence examination and methods used in examining them. Also, the means at which they acquired the evidence among others.
Answer:
All enterprise platforms are cloud based.
Answer:
Proprietary
Explanation:
Free and Open source is available for anyone to do modifications.
No need to woory abt age !!! In today's competitive grant world, this phenomenon is exacerbated. It is dangerous to one's funding to go against the trend, and if there is a lab to support and mouths to feed, the disincentives are great. This phenomenon stifles creativity, perhaps far more than biological age does.
<span>While it is not frequently acknowledged either in the popular press or in scientific literature, a significant fraction of scientific discovery is the result of serendipity (or to put it more bluntly, luck). From the discovery of penicillin by Fleming to the discovery of new ionization techniques such as MALDI that power modern mass-spectrometry based proteomic research, luck has frequently played a big role. Such discoveries are generally attributed to hard work and genius, rather than to luck. Doing so gives the “genius” too much credit and luck too little.
</span><span>Risk taking is where most of the big discoveries in science lie. so takerisks.
</span>enjoy always specially when you r working and learn to say no
Learning to say “no” is particularly important for young faculty, who find themselves barraged with such requests, and who can easily get sucked into full-time committee duties. It is wise to step back frequently and ask, “overall, is this work I am doing fun?” If the answer is no, perhaps it is time to revisit and consider diving into a new area.
<span>Note the distinction in this guideline from: “learn to write and present well.”
</span><span>Understanding and conveying the big picture for one's work is perhaps the greatest challenge facing young scientists
</span>That's all I can give.
Answer: This can allow for less hackers to acquire your most essential and private information. It will be kept private to you and only others you share with.
Explanation: For example, if I wanted to edit a document without being given the consent to do so this will breach the security of user permissions, but if the individual was to set the document to view only, I would not have access to edit or even change little aspects of it.
