Answer:
a. Suppose GP issues $ 100$100 million of new stock to buy back the debt. What is the expected return of the stock after this transaction?
b. Suppose instead GP issues $ 50.00$50.00 million of new debt to repurchase stock. i. If the risk of the debt does not change, what is the expected return of the stock after this transaction?
ii. If the risk of the debt increases, would the expected return of the stock be higher or lower than when debt is issued to repurchase stock in part (i)?
- If the risk of the debt increases, then the cost of the debt will increase. Therefore, the company will need to spend more money paying the interests related to the new debt which would decrease the ROE compared to the 18% of (i). Since we do not know the new cost of the debt, we cannot know exactly by how much it will affect the ROE, but I assume it will still be higher than the previous ROE.
Explanation:
common stock $200 million
total debt $100 million
required rate of return 15%
cost of debt 6%
current profits = ($200 million x 15%) + ($100 x 6%) = $30 million + $6 million = $36 million
if equity increases to $300 million, ROI = 36/300 = 12
if instead new debt is issued at 6%:
equity 150 million, debt 150 million
cost of debt = 150 million x 6% = $9 million
remaining profits = $36 - $9 = $27 million
ROI = 27/150 = 18%
The answer is: averaged over time, Sheridan attends worship services regularly.
When we use principle of aggregation, we would not rely on single measurement to make a representation of a person's behavior. We rely more on multiple sets of measurements.
From the case above, Sheridan not attending the services for two weeks could be explained by things such as personal issues or physical illness. Since she considers herself as religious who attend regularly, it is very likely that averaged over time, Sheridan attends worship services regularly.
Answer:
Legal but Unethical
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Gander's business conduct is Legal but Unethical. It is legal because since it is a developing country there is most likely no law against the amount that the company's must pay employees. On the other hand it is unethical because the company is taking advantage of the necessity of the workers and is paying them nonliving wages.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The greatest risk of a low-cost provider strategy is getting lost with overly high price reduction and ending up with lower profit.
<h3>Low-cost / low-price advantage </h3>
It results in high profit only if;
- (1) prices are reduced by less than the size of the cost advantage or
- (2) the added volume is large enough to bring in a bigger total profit despite lower margins per unit sold.
Therefore, the greatest risk is a low profit.
learn more on low cost strategy from here: brainly.com/question/5516605
Answer:
3. 5,110,000 and 5,170,000
Explanation:
Number of shares to be used in computing basic earnings per share
= 4800000*12/12 + 200000*9/12 + 4800004/12
= 4800000 + 150000 + 160000
= 5,110,000
Number of shares to be used in computing dilute earnings per share
= 4800000*12/12 + 200000*9/12 + 4800004/12 + (6000000/1000)*40*3/12
= 4800000 + 150000 + 160000 + 60000
= 5,170,000
Therefore, The number of shares to be used in computing basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share on December 31, 2018 is 5,110,000 and 5,170,000.
