I believe the answer is: A microhistorian might document one day in a town that experienced particularly high unemployment levels, while a comparative historian might graph unemployment levels in several cities throughout the Great Depression.
Microhistorian tend to choose that method because they tend to favour a more intensive research within smaller unit of research (such as villages, small neighbourhood, etc). Comparative historian on the other hand, might choose that method because they favour research technique that collect as many data as possible from one segment of historical period and compared it with the another.
It was "Georgia" that was the North American colony that was intended to serve as a penal colony for <span>debtors, since it was thought that removing them from England would benefit both England and the New World economy. </span>
The conclusion of the NYE committee’s 1933 report on the
World War I is that the greed of the American munitions makers, the financiers,
and as well as the bankers, were responsible for the nation to enter the World
War I.
“Property” wasn’t included in the unalienable rights .
Answer:
There are 3 main reasons for European Explorations. Them being for the sake of their economy, religion, and glory. They wanted to improve their economy for instance by acquiring more spices, gold, and better and faster believed in the need to spread their religion, Christianity.
