1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
torisob [31]
3 years ago
13

Ali and Bob graduated from Kenyatta University in 2010. Ali set up a mobile phone business in Nairobi. Bob established a poultry

business in Kisumu. As part of his strategy to develop his business, Bob has contracted farmers who rear chicken and supply him with eggs which he sells in Nairobi. In January 2011, Bob expressed an intention to acquire several pieces of cell phones from Ali to be supplied to the farmers for ease of communication. Ali informed him that he could avail them for Ksh. 5,000 apiece. On 2nd February Bob did text Ali on his cell phone and stated that he would be willing to purchase the phones at the stated price. Ali’s phone was stolen just before the message was received. In the meantime, not having heard from Bob he sold the phones to Chali.
Advice Bob on the legal rights, if any, that he may have against Ali and Chali.
Discuss the remedies available where a breach of contract is proved.
Law
1 answer:
Sav [38]3 years ago
4 0
Bob does not have an legal rights because he and Ali did not sign any contract on purchasing the phones on a certain date. Ali did not hear of him since her phone was stolen right before he sent her a message. Ali could not have known if Bob was going to purchase phones. Ali also thought that Bob wouldn’t buy the phones because some time has passed, they both talked in January about his intentions of buying phones for his farmers, he had intentions but wasn’t decided on buying, as the time had passed and Bob had texted Ali that he would want the phones, Ali’s phone was stolen and she did not have any motive to not sell the phones to Bob.
You might be interested in
What is another word for RECIDIVIST
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

relapsed ( adjective) fallen angel (noun) habitual criminal (noun) prisoner (noun)

8 0
3 years ago
Three years ago, the state of Nevada passed a law making the recreational use of marijuana legal. Yet such use of marijuana is a
Oksanka [162]

The basis on which Nevada had the authority to <u>override a federal law</u> is <u>Option A</u>. ... widespread public acceptance and general use of marijuana has made it difficult to enforce federal law.

<h3>Can a state override a federal law?</h3>

The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution is Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution.

The Supremacy Clause means that the federal constitution and laws take precedence over state laws and constitutions.

<h3>Answer Options:</h3>

A. Nevada doesn’t have the authority to override federal law. Federal law stands supreme. Yet, the force of widespread public acceptance and general use of marijuana has made it difficult to enforce federal law. We also saw this effect during Prohibition in the 1920s – which showed that even constitutional law has limits if a substantial part of the population does not support that law.

B. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms has the statutory authority to allow exceptions to federal drug laws.

C. States have precedence over federal authorities on matters of recreational drug use.

D. The executive authority of the governor of Nevada makes such laws exceptions to federal prohibitions. By virtue of signing the legislation making marijuana legal, Governor Brian Sandoval’s executive authority gave pot’s legal possession precedence over federal law.

Thus, the basis on which Nevada had the authority to <u>override a federal law</u> is <u>Option A</u>. ... widespread public acceptance and general use of marijuana has made it difficult to enforce federal law.

Learn more about the Supremacy Clause at brainly.com/question/12959391

6 0
2 years ago
What does it mean if a crime is a conspiracy?
ad-work [718]

Answer: The answer is C

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Philosophy to be precise
Fudgin [204]

Answer:

Well, Holism is the idea that various systems should be viewed as wholes, consequentialism does not specify the desired outcome, while utilitarianism specifies good as the desired outcome. including Deontology which focuses on the rules, or the universal norms. Virtue ethics you can say someone is morally right only if his actions express a certain virtue.

Explanation:

What is Holism? How is it different from utilitarianism, consequentialism, Deontology, and virtue ethics?

5 0
3 years ago
What are the four components of a vehicles control system?
astra-53 [7]

The four components of a vehicles control system include the steering wheel and column, the brakes, the gear or shift mechanism and the accelerator.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What process uses rock layers and index fossils to determine an object's estimated age? Radioactive dating Law of superposition
    13·2 answers
  • Select all of the following that are concurrent powers under the principle of federalism.
    13·1 answer
  • EMERGENCY! 20 pts :)
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT true of blogs ?
    15·2 answers
  • Que mecanismo de control, fuera del poder judicial ,crearías para lograr que un político procurará el bienestar del pueblo y no
    12·1 answer
  • Vehicles are excepted to be moving on highways
    8·1 answer
  • What type of sources should you read first, according to the GATHER model
    11·1 answer
  • What is the best way for state government to determine which proposal to fund?
    6·1 answer
  • Andre lives in a neighborhood that has become known for drug activity. He notices that police cars have begun to slowly drive do
    13·1 answer
  • Ya'll all are wrong of your answers so stop posting if your going to put the wrong answers
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!