Ali and Bob graduated from Kenyatta University in 2010. Ali set up a mobile phone business in Nairobi. Bob established a poultry
business in Kisumu. As part of his strategy to develop his business, Bob has contracted farmers who rear chicken and supply him with eggs which he sells in Nairobi. In January 2011, Bob expressed an intention to acquire several pieces of cell phones from Ali to be supplied to the farmers for ease of communication. Ali informed him that he could avail them for Ksh. 5,000 apiece. On 2nd February Bob did text Ali on his cell phone and stated that he would be willing to purchase the phones at the stated price. Ali’s phone was stolen just before the message was received. In the meantime, not having heard from Bob he sold the phones to Chali. Advice Bob on the legal rights, if any, that he may have against Ali and Chali.
Discuss the remedies available where a breach of contract is proved.
Bob does not have an legal rights because he and Ali did not sign any contract on purchasing the phones on a certain date. Ali did not hear of him since her phone was stolen right before he sent her a message. Ali could not have known if Bob was going to purchase phones. Ali also thought that Bob wouldn’t buy the phones because some time has passed, they both talked in January about his intentions of buying phones for his farmers, he had intentions but wasn’t decided on buying, as the time had passed and Bob had texted Ali that he would want the phones, Ali’s phone was stolen and she did not have any motive to not sell the phones to Bob.
Persons riding mopeds have the same rights and duties as drivers of motor vehicles. Moped operators. A: Must only ride on roadways, bicycle paths, and foot paths
Traditional mortgages are simply constructed, with a mortgagor borrowing money at a fixed or variable interest rate and repaying the debt over time. ... These mortgages have less stringent asset and income restrictions. However, there is a cost: the lender can charge the borrower a higher interest rate.
The supreme court does act as the last court of appeals (with cases regarding constitutional law and federal law), after local and state courts. It also hears cases that involve the US Constitution. Small Claim Courts settle local cases involving small amounts of money, not the Supreme Court. Therefore, 2 is false.