If f(x)=x+1 and then x became 2, you would have the function f(x)=3. So basically for that function you would be going up three over 1. That function is already g(x)=4x. If X became 2, you would have g(x)=8x. The rate of up 8 and then over one. Because of that, g(x) would be higher
the commutative property was used
Step-by-step explanation:
As seen from the graph, f(x) and g(x) intersect each other when x = 3.
Hence, f(3) = g(3).
First we simplify the inequality
1. <em>multiply 6 by the other side of the inequality (-4) </em>
Now we have ...
a > -24
Anything that can be a solution to the inequality <u>must be greater than -24</u>
-18 is greater than -24
This means that, YES! a = -18 IS a solution to the inequality
