Answer:
certainty of punishment
Explanation:
In simple words,Certainness of penalty effectively means that deterrence occurs if a criminal offence is performed. Therefore, to discourage criminals their penalty must be quick. This concept is based on the theory that Too custodial sentence is unfair, and unsevere punishment does not dissuade offenders from committing crimes.
Certainness has a larger effect on prevention than penalty intensity. Analysis underlines the much more important role which certainty serves in prevention than intensity— it is the likelihood about being captured that dissuades an individual from breaking the law, not really the apprehension of becoming prosecuted or the magnitude of the penalty.
Based on the scenario, Carl is likely experiencing the bend
because of several problems such as;
<span>-
</span>Applying boyle’s law because a lot of the gas
was being forced on his bloodstream during the dive
<span>-
</span>The plane that he’s in is not pressurize to the
sea level by which it reduces the atmospheric pressure holding the gas in
suspension
1. B Deprived children
2. C The right to against stelf-inscrimination
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
Answer:
The answer is "false".
Explanation:
Paul and Barnabas are the will of God. It believes that it is a spirit of the body. Paul was going on the first missionary journey that is a result of “... the Gentiles a Door of Faith”. They both represented the local church in Antioch in their professional role, that's why the answer to this question false.
